National Vision Holdings, Inc. (EYE) vs Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT)
A side-by-side comparison of National Vision Holdings, Inc. and Liquidity Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
$16.58Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 9:40 AM EDT
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
$43.12Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 9:40 AM EDT
Total return — EYE vs LQDT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9yEYE -40.6% (-5.6%/yr)LQDT +638.8% (+24.9%/yr)LQDT compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
EYE LQDT
EYE vs LQDT: by the numbers
- •LQDT is the larger company ($1.34B vs $1.33B market cap).
- •EYE trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (27.08 vs 42.27 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •LQDT converts more revenue to profit (6.79% vs 2.47% net margin).
- •LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.03% vs -0.31% CAGR).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EYE | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 27.08 | 42.27 |
| Forward P/E | 16.44 | 23.43 |
| P/S ratio | 0.65 | 2.75 |
| P/B ratio | 1.48 | 5.70 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.29 | 20.83 |
| FCF yield | 3.70% | 6.69% |
Profitability
| Metric | EYE | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.22% | 46.56% |
| Operating margin | 4.13% | 9.00% |
| Net margin | 2.47% | 6.79% |
| ROE | 5.61% | 14.10% |
| ROIC | 3.86% | 11.85% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EYE | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.31% | 15.03% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.84% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -28.54% | 9.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -21.96% | 14.55% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EYE or LQDT?
- EYE has the lower trailing P/E: EYE trades at 27.08 and LQDT at 42.27. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EYE or LQDT?
- Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — EYE at a -0.31% CAGR versus LQDT at 15.03%.
- Is EYE or LQDT more profitable?
- LQDT runs the higher net margin — EYE at 2.47% versus LQDT at 6.79%.
- How have EYE and LQDT total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, EYE delivered -21.96% and LQDT delivered 14.55% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
National Vision P/E ratioLiquidity Services P/E ratioNational Vision ROELiquidity Services ROENational Vision operating marginLiquidity Services operating marginNational Vision revenue growthLiquidity Services revenue growthNational Vision free cash flowLiquidity Services free cash flow
National Vision & Liquidity Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.