Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) vs Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)
SNA leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
$160.16Industrials
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated
$400.95Industrials
Total return — EXPD vs SNA
growth of $100 · last 30yEXPD +8071.4%SNA +1144.9%EXPD compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
EXPD SNA
EXPD vs SNA: by the numbers
- •EXPD is the larger company ($20.95B vs $20.77B market cap).
- •SNA trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.71 vs 25.92 P/E).
- •SNA converts more revenue to profit (19.99% vs 7.48% net margin).
- •SNA grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.87% vs 0.10% CAGR).
- •SNA pays the higher dividend yield (2.36% vs 0.99%).
Which is better, EXPD or SNA?
Metric tally: EXPD 4 · SNA 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSNA(lower P/E)
GrowthSNA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSNA(higher dividend yield)
QualityEXPD(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EXPD | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.92 | 20.71● |
| Forward P/E | 23.57 | 20.98● |
| P/S ratio | 1.92● | 4.13 |
| P/B ratio | 9.40 | 3.55● |
| PEG ratio | 6.52 | 1.87● |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.78 | 13.82● |
| FCF yield | 4.29% | 5.10%● |
Profitability
| Metric | EXPD | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 20.23% | 51.30%● |
| Operating margin | 9.67% | 24.71%● |
| Net margin | 7.48% | 19.99%● |
| ROE | 36.62%● | 17.18% |
| ROIC | 26.65%● | 13.79% |
Dividends
| Metric | EXPD | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 2.36%● |
| Payout ratio | 26.47% | 48.46% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EXPD | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.10% | 5.87%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.60% | 11.05%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.95%● | 0.58% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.30% | 15.53%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, EXPD or SNA?
- It depends on your goal. value: SNA (lower P/E); growth: SNA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SNA (higher dividend yield); quality: EXPD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SNA leads 13 to 4.
- Is EXPD or SNA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper: EXPD trades at a 25.92 P/E and SNA at 20.71.
- Which has grown faster, EXPD or SNA?
- Over the past five years, SNA grew revenue faster — EXPD at a 0.10% CAGR versus SNA at 5.87%.
- Does EXPD or SNA pay a bigger dividend?
- EXPD yields 0.99% and SNA yields 2.36% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EXPD or SNA more profitable?
- SNA runs the higher net margin — EXPD at 7.48% versus SNA at 19.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, EXPD or SNA?
- Over the past 10-year, EXPD delivered the higher annualized total return — EXPD at 14.32% versus SNA at 13.03%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Expeditors International of Washington P/E ratioSnap-on P/E ratioExpeditors International of Washington dividend yieldSnap-on dividend yieldExpeditors International of Washington ROESnap-on ROEExpeditors International of Washington operating marginSnap-on operating marginExpeditors International of Washington revenue growthSnap-on revenue growthExpeditors International of Washington free cash flowSnap-on free cash flow
Expeditors International of Washington & Snap-on appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.