Is EW or HUM cheaper?

On trailing earnings, HUM is cheaper: EW trades at a 48.29 P/E and HUM at 41.05.

Which has grown faster, EW or HUM?

Over the past five years, HUM grew revenue faster — EW at a 7.10% CAGR versus HUM at 11.71%.

Does EW or HUM pay a bigger dividend?

HUM pays a dividend (0.92% yield) while EW does not currently pay one.

Is EW or HUM more profitable?

EW runs the higher net margin — EW at 17.34% versus HUM at 0.82%.

Which has been the better investment, EW or HUM?

Over the past 10-year, EW delivered the higher annualized total return — EW at 10.98% versus HUM at 8.62%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) vs Humana Inc. (HUM)

HUM leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and Humana Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation

Total return — EW vs HUM

growth of $100 · last 26y

EW +6502.2%HUM +5150.9%EW compounded faster

EW HUM

EW vs HUM: by the numbers

•EW is the larger company ($52.27B vs $46.08B market cap).
•HUM trades at the lower earnings multiple (41.05 vs 48.29 P/E).
•EW converts more revenue to profit (17.34% vs 0.82% net margin).
•HUM grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.71% vs 7.10% CAGR).
•HUM pays a dividend (0.92% yield) while EW does not currently pay one.

Which is better, EW or HUM?

Metric tally: EW 7 · HUM 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueHUM(lower P/E)

GrowthHUM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityEW(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EW	HUM
P/E ratio	48.29	41.05●
Forward P/E	26.89	24.23●
P/S ratio	8.36	0.34●
P/B ratio	5.10	2.49●
PEG ratio	7.03	—
EV / EBITDA	26.80	25.31●
FCF yield	2.07%	2.75%●

Profitability

Metric	EW	HUM
Gross margin	78.01%●	14.01%
Operating margin	27.62%●	1.01%
Net margin	17.34%●	0.82%
ROE	10.58%●	6.08%
ROIC	11.40%●	3.12%

Dividends

Metric	EW	HUM
Dividend yield	—	0.92%
Payout ratio	—	35.87%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EW	HUM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.10%	11.71%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	6.87%●	-17.27%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.74%●	-17.19%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-2.60%	-1.76%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, EW or HUM?: It depends on your goal. value: HUM (lower P/E); growth: HUM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: EW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, HUM leads 8 to 7.
Is EW or HUM cheaper?: On trailing earnings, HUM is cheaper: EW trades at a 48.29 P/E and HUM at 41.05.
Which has grown faster, EW or HUM?: Over the past five years, HUM grew revenue faster — EW at a 7.10% CAGR versus HUM at 11.71%.
Does EW or HUM pay a bigger dividend?: HUM pays a dividend (0.92% yield) while EW does not currently pay one.
Is EW or HUM more profitable?: EW runs the higher net margin — EW at 17.34% versus HUM at 0.82%.
Which has been the better investment, EW or HUM?: Over the past 10-year, EW delivered the higher annualized total return — EW at 10.98% versus HUM at 8.62%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EW analysis Full HUM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Edwards Lifesciences P/E ratio Humana P/E ratio Edwards Lifesciences dividend yield Humana dividend yield Edwards Lifesciences ROE Humana ROE Edwards Lifesciences operating margin Humana operating margin Edwards Lifesciences revenue growth Humana revenue growth Edwards Lifesciences free cash flow Humana free cash flow

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.