Which has the lower trailing P/E, EW or HUM?

HUM has the lower trailing P/E: EW trades at 49.59 and HUM at 37.70. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EW or HUM?

Over the past five years, HUM grew revenue faster — EW at a 5.75% CAGR versus HUM at 12.61%.

Does EW or HUM pay a bigger dividend?

HUM pays a dividend (0.86% yield), while EW has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is EW or HUM more profitable?

EW runs the higher net margin — EW at 15.43% versus HUM at 0.88%.

How have EW and HUM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, EW delivered 8.24% and HUM delivered 9.71% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) vs Humana Inc. (HUM)

A side-by-side comparison of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and Humana Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation

$49.69B

$86.29HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

HUM

Humana Inc.

$47.81B

$398.13HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — EW vs HUM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

EW +116.4% (+8.0%/yr)HUM +152.8% (+9.7%/yr)HUM compounded faster over this window

EW HUM

EW vs HUM: by the numbers

•EW is the larger company ($49.69B vs $47.81B market cap).
•HUM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (37.70 vs 49.59 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•EW converts more revenue to profit (15.43% vs 0.88% net margin).
•HUM grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.61% vs 5.75% CAGR).
•HUM pays a dividend (0.86% yield), while EW has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EW	HUM
P/E ratio	49.59	37.70
Forward P/E	28.75	43.49
P/S ratio	7.63	0.33
P/B ratio	4.68	2.49
EV / EBITDA	23.80	19.89
FCF yield	2.89%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	EW	HUM
Gross margin	77.98%	13.65%
Operating margin	28.09%	1.39%
Net margin	15.43%	0.88%
ROE	9.46%	6.65%
ROIC	10.22%	4.52%

Dividends

Metric	EW	HUM
Dividend yield	N/A	0.86%
Payout ratio	N/A	33.52%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EW	HUM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.75%	12.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	6.87%	-17.27%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.41%	-17.19%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-6.94%	1.39%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EW or HUM?: HUM has the lower trailing P/E: EW trades at 49.59 and HUM at 37.70. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EW or HUM?: Over the past five years, HUM grew revenue faster — EW at a 5.75% CAGR versus HUM at 12.61%.
Does EW or HUM pay a bigger dividend?: HUM pays a dividend (0.86% yield), while EW has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is EW or HUM more profitable?: EW runs the higher net margin — EW at 15.43% versus HUM at 0.88%.
How have EW and HUM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, EW delivered 8.24% and HUM delivered 9.71% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EW analysis Full HUM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Edwards Lifesciences P/E ratio Humana P/E ratio Humana dividend yield Edwards Lifesciences ROE Humana ROE Edwards Lifesciences operating margin Humana operating margin Edwards Lifesciences revenue growth Humana revenue growth Edwards Lifesciences free cash flow Humana free cash flow

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.