Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) vs Union Pacific Corporation (UNP)
UNP leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Eaton Corporation plc and Union Pacific Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
$391.39Industrials
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation
$272.70Industrials
Total return — ETN vs UNP
growth of $100 · last 30yETN +3008.7%UNP +2234.8%ETN compounded faster
ETN UNP
ETN vs UNP: by the numbers
- •UNP is the larger company ($161.91B vs $151.98B market cap).
- •UNP trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.46 vs 38.26 P/E).
- •UNP converts more revenue to profit (29.20% vs 13.99% net margin).
- •ETN grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.94% vs 5.05% CAGR).
- •UNP pays the higher dividend yield (2.02% vs 1.09%).
Which is better, ETN or UNP?
Metric tally: ETN 7 · UNP 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUNP(lower P/E)
GrowthETN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeUNP(higher dividend yield)
QualityETN(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | ETN | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 38.26 | 22.46● |
| Forward P/E | 24.99 | 19.87● |
| P/S ratio | 5.34● | 6.55 |
| P/B ratio | 7.71● | 8.34 |
| PEG ratio | 3.04 | 2.34● |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.13 | 14.73● |
| FCF yield | 3.08% | 3.52%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ETN | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.89% | 45.67%● |
| Operating margin | 18.13% | 40.09%● |
| Net margin | 13.99% | 29.20%● |
| ROE | 20.19% | 37.15%● |
| ROIC | 13.14%● | 11.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | ETN | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.09% | 2.02%● |
| Payout ratio | 40.80% | 45.96% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ETN | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.94%● | 5.05% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.48%● | 8.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 13.57%● | 0.04% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 23.64%● | 6.62% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ETN or UNP?
- It depends on your goal. value: UNP (lower P/E); growth: ETN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: UNP (higher dividend yield); quality: ETN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UNP leads 10 to 7.
- Is ETN or UNP cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UNP is cheaper: ETN trades at a 38.26 P/E and UNP at 22.46.
- Which has grown faster, ETN or UNP?
- Over the past five years, ETN grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.94% CAGR versus UNP at 5.05%.
- Does ETN or UNP pay a bigger dividend?
- ETN yields 1.09% and UNP yields 2.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ETN or UNP more profitable?
- UNP runs the higher net margin — ETN at 13.99% versus UNP at 29.20%.
- Which has been the better investment, ETN or UNP?
- Over the past 10-year, ETN delivered the higher annualized total return — ETN at 23.24% versus UNP at 14.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Eaton P/E ratioUnion Pacific P/E ratioEaton dividend yieldUnion Pacific dividend yieldEaton ROEUnion Pacific ROEEaton operating marginUnion Pacific operating marginEaton revenue growthUnion Pacific revenue growthEaton free cash flowUnion Pacific free cash flow
Eaton & Union Pacific appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.