Is ETN or SMEGF cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ETN is cheaper: ETN trades at a 41.23 P/E and SMEGF at 65.80.

Which has grown faster, ETN or SMEGF?

Over the past five years, ETN grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.94% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.98%.

Does ETN or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?

ETN yields 1.01% and SMEGF yields 0.42% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ETN or SMEGF more profitable?

ETN runs the higher net margin — ETN at 13.99% versus SMEGF at 6.15%.

Which has been the better investment, ETN or SMEGF?

Over the past 5-year, SMEGF delivered the higher annualized total return — ETN at 24.17% versus SMEGF at 45.66%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) vs Siemens Energy AG (SMEGF)

ETN leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Eaton Corporation plc and Siemens Energy AG across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

ETN

Eaton Corporation plc

Total return — ETN vs SMEGF

growth of $100 · last 6y

ETN +310.9%SMEGF +665.1%SMEGF compounded faster

ETN SMEGF

ETN vs SMEGF: by the numbers

•SMEGF is the larger company ($167.76B vs $163.77B market cap).
•ETN trades at the lower earnings multiple (41.23 vs 65.80 P/E).
•ETN converts more revenue to profit (13.99% vs 6.15% net margin).
•ETN grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.94% vs 7.98% CAGR).
•ETN pays the higher dividend yield (1.01% vs 0.42%).

Which is better, ETN or SMEGF?

Metric tally: ETN 9 · SMEGF 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueETN(lower P/E)

GrowthETN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeETN(higher dividend yield)

QualityETN(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ETN	SMEGF
P/E ratio	41.23●	65.80
Forward P/E	26.93●	32.61
P/S ratio	5.76	3.63●
P/B ratio	8.31●	13.69
PEG ratio	3.04	1.32●
EV / EBITDA	29.76	29.43
FCF yield	2.86%	4.18%●

Profitability

Metric	ETN	SMEGF
Gross margin	36.89%●	18.82%
Operating margin	18.13%●	7.96%
Net margin	13.99%●	6.15%
ROE	20.19%	23.20%●
ROIC	13.14%●	9.12%

Dividends

Metric	ETN	SMEGF
Dividend yield	1.01%●	0.42%
Payout ratio	40.80%	36.48%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ETN	SMEGF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.94%●	7.98%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.48%	45.13%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.57%	47.34%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	26.81%	45.66%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, ETN or SMEGF?: It depends on your goal. value: ETN (lower P/E); growth: ETN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ETN (higher dividend yield); quality: ETN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ETN leads 9 to 7.
Is ETN or SMEGF cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ETN is cheaper: ETN trades at a 41.23 P/E and SMEGF at 65.80.
Which has grown faster, ETN or SMEGF?: Over the past five years, ETN grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.94% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.98%.
Does ETN or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?: ETN yields 1.01% and SMEGF yields 0.42% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ETN or SMEGF more profitable?: ETN runs the higher net margin — ETN at 13.99% versus SMEGF at 6.15%.
Which has been the better investment, ETN or SMEGF?: Over the past 5-year, SMEGF delivered the higher annualized total return — ETN at 24.17% versus SMEGF at 45.66%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ETN analysis Full SMEGF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Eaton P/E ratio Siemens Energy AG P/E ratio Eaton dividend yield Siemens Energy AG dividend yield Eaton ROE Siemens Energy AG ROE Eaton operating margin Siemens Energy AG operating margin Eaton revenue growth Siemens Energy AG revenue growth Eaton free cash flow Siemens Energy AG free cash flow

Eaton & Siemens Energy AG appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.