Which has the lower trailing P/E, ETN or SMEGF?

ETN has the lower trailing P/E: ETN trades at 42.24 and SMEGF at 58.71. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ETN or SMEGF?

Over the past five years, ETN grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.45% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.98%.

Does ETN or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?

ETN yields 1.03% and SMEGF yields 0.47% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ETN or SMEGF more profitable?

ETN runs the higher net margin — ETN at 12.76% versus SMEGF at 6.15%.

How have ETN and SMEGF total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, ETN delivered 23.61% and SMEGF delivered 45.54% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) vs Siemens Energy AG (SMEGF)

A side-by-side comparison of Eaton Corporation plc and Siemens Energy AG across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ETN

Eaton Corporation plc

$170.16B

$438.23IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SMEGF

Siemens Energy AG

$148.06B

$173.10IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 3, 2026, 3:56 PM EDT

Total return — ETN vs SMEGF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

ETN +335.2%SMEGF +589.1%SMEGF compounded faster

ETN SMEGF

ETN vs SMEGF: by the numbers

•ETN is the larger company ($170.16B vs $148.06B market cap).
•ETN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (42.24 vs 58.71 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ETN converts more revenue to profit (12.76% vs 6.15% net margin).
•ETN grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.45% vs 7.98% CAGR).
•ETN pays the higher dividend yield (1.03% vs 0.47%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ETN	SMEGF
P/E ratio	42.24	58.71
Forward P/E	30.88	34.78
P/S ratio	5.39	3.24
P/B ratio	7.98	12.22
PEG ratio	3.05	1.32
EV / EBITDA	28.12	25.82
FCF yield	3.06%	4.68%

Profitability

Metric	ETN	SMEGF
Gross margin	35.90%	18.82%
Operating margin	17.68%	7.96%
Net margin	12.76%	6.15%
ROE	18.91%	23.20%
ROIC	13.14%	9.12%

Dividends

Metric	ETN	SMEGF
Dividend yield	1.03%	0.47%
Payout ratio	40.80%	36.48%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ETN	SMEGF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.45%	7.98%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.48%	45.13%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	16.55%	47.34%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	23.24%	45.54%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ETN or SMEGF?: ETN has the lower trailing P/E: ETN trades at 42.24 and SMEGF at 58.71. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ETN or SMEGF?: Over the past five years, ETN grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.45% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.98%.
Does ETN or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?: ETN yields 1.03% and SMEGF yields 0.47% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ETN or SMEGF more profitable?: ETN runs the higher net margin — ETN at 12.76% versus SMEGF at 6.15%.
How have ETN and SMEGF total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, ETN delivered 23.61% and SMEGF delivered 45.54% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ETN analysis Full SMEGF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Eaton P/E ratio Siemens Energy AG P/E ratio Eaton dividend yield Siemens Energy AG dividend yield Eaton ROE Siemens Energy AG ROE Eaton operating margin Siemens Energy AG operating margin Eaton revenue growth Siemens Energy AG revenue growth Eaton free cash flow Siemens Energy AG free cash flow

Eaton & Siemens Energy AG appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 3, 2026.