Is ETN or SBGSY cheaper?

On trailing earnings, SBGSY is cheaper: ETN trades at a 39.62 P/E and SBGSY at 19.22.

Which has grown faster, ETN or SBGSY?

Over the past five years, ETN grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.94% CAGR versus SBGSY at 7.72%.

Does ETN or SBGSY pay a bigger dividend?

ETN yields 1.06% and SBGSY yields 1.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ETN or SBGSY more profitable?

ETN runs the higher net margin — ETN at 13.99% versus SBGSY at 10.74%.

Which has been the better investment, ETN or SBGSY?

Over the past 10-year, ETN delivered the higher annualized total return — ETN at 23.45% versus SBGSY at 21.55%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) vs Schneider Electric S.E. (SBGSY)

SBGSY leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Eaton Corporation plc and Schneider Electric S.E. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

ETN

Eaton Corporation plc

$157.37B

$405.28Industrials

SBGSY

Schneider Electric S.E.

$178.64B

$63.53Industrials

Total return — ETN vs SBGSY

growth of $100 · last 18y

ETN +1058.3%SBGSY +471.2%ETN compounded faster

ETN SBGSY

ETN vs SBGSY: by the numbers

•SBGSY is the larger company ($178.64B vs $157.37B market cap).
•SBGSY trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.22 vs 39.62 P/E).
•ETN converts more revenue to profit (13.99% vs 10.74% net margin).
•ETN grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.94% vs 7.72% CAGR).
•SBGSY pays the higher dividend yield (1.55% vs 1.06%).

Which is better, ETN or SBGSY?

Metric tally: ETN 8 · SBGSY 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSBGSY(lower P/E)

GrowthETN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeSBGSY(higher dividend yield)

QualityETN(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ETN	SBGSY
P/E ratio	39.62	19.22●
Forward P/E	25.87●	27.73
P/S ratio	5.53	2.07●
P/B ratio	7.98	6.37●
PEG ratio	3.05	1.47●
EV / EBITDA	28.73	11.42●
FCF yield	2.98%	5.96%●

Profitability

Metric	ETN	SBGSY
Gross margin	36.89%	41.69%●
Operating margin	18.13%●	16.35%
Net margin	13.99%●	10.74%
ROE	20.19%	33.03%●
ROIC	13.14%●	10.96%

Dividends

Metric	ETN	SBGSY
Dividend yield	1.06%	1.55%●
Payout ratio	40.80%	56.55%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ETN	SBGSY
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.94%●	7.72%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.48%●	13.07%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.57%●	5.65%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	24.90%●	16.28%

Frequently asked

Which is better, ETN or SBGSY?: It depends on your goal. value: SBGSY (lower P/E); growth: ETN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SBGSY (higher dividend yield); quality: ETN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SBGSY leads 9 to 8.
Is ETN or SBGSY cheaper?: On trailing earnings, SBGSY is cheaper: ETN trades at a 39.62 P/E and SBGSY at 19.22.
Which has grown faster, ETN or SBGSY?: Over the past five years, ETN grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.94% CAGR versus SBGSY at 7.72%.
Does ETN or SBGSY pay a bigger dividend?: ETN yields 1.06% and SBGSY yields 1.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ETN or SBGSY more profitable?: ETN runs the higher net margin — ETN at 13.99% versus SBGSY at 10.74%.
Which has been the better investment, ETN or SBGSY?: Over the past 10-year, ETN delivered the higher annualized total return — ETN at 23.45% versus SBGSY at 21.55%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ETN analysis Full SBGSY analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Eaton P/E ratio Schneider Electric S.E. P/E ratio Eaton dividend yield Schneider Electric S.E. dividend yield Eaton ROE Schneider Electric S.E. ROE Eaton operating margin Schneider Electric S.E. operating margin Eaton revenue growth Schneider Electric S.E. revenue growth Eaton free cash flow Schneider Electric S.E. free cash flow

Eaton & Schneider Electric S.E. appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.