Which has the lower trailing P/E, ETN or RYCEY?

RYCEY has the lower trailing P/E: ETN trades at 42.32 and RYCEY at 14.89. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ETN or RYCEY?

Over the past five years, RYCEY grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.45% CAGR versus RYCEY at 12.71%.

Does ETN or RYCEY pay a bigger dividend?

ETN yields 1.04% and RYCEY yields 0.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ETN or RYCEY more profitable?

RYCEY runs the higher net margin — ETN at 12.76% versus RYCEY at 26.94%.

How have ETN and RYCEY total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ETN delivered 22.83% and RYCEY delivered 7.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) vs Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY)

A side-by-side comparison of Eaton Corporation plc and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ETN

Eaton Corporation plc

$156.40B

$402.78IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

RYCEY

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc

$172.00B

$20.64IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — ETN vs RYCEY

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ETN +688.8% (+22.9%/yr)RYCEY +115.5% (+8.0%/yr)ETN compounded faster over this window

ETN RYCEY

ETN vs RYCEY: by the numbers

•RYCEY is the larger company ($172.00B vs $156.40B market cap).
•RYCEY trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.89 vs 42.32 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RYCEY converts more revenue to profit (26.94% vs 12.76% net margin).
•RYCEY grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.71% vs 9.45% CAGR).
•ETN pays the higher dividend yield (1.04% vs 0.39%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ETN	RYCEY
P/E ratio	42.32	14.89
Forward P/E	30.75	47.84
P/S ratio	5.40	6.13
P/B ratio	8.00	45.95
EV / EBITDA	28.17	28.16
FCF yield	2.78%	2.83%

Profitability

Metric	ETN	RYCEY
Gross margin	35.90%	29.12%
Operating margin	17.68%	16.82%
Net margin	12.76%	26.94%
ROE	18.91%	209.94%
ROIC	9.09%	15.14%

Dividends

Metric	ETN	RYCEY
Dividend yield	1.04%	0.39%
Payout ratio	41.37%	8.77%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ETN	RYCEY
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.45%	12.71%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.48%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	14.37%	26.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	21.47%	68.17%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ETN or RYCEY?: RYCEY has the lower trailing P/E: ETN trades at 42.32 and RYCEY at 14.89. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ETN or RYCEY?: Over the past five years, RYCEY grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.45% CAGR versus RYCEY at 12.71%.
Does ETN or RYCEY pay a bigger dividend?: ETN yields 1.04% and RYCEY yields 0.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ETN or RYCEY more profitable?: RYCEY runs the higher net margin — ETN at 12.76% versus RYCEY at 26.94%.
How have ETN and RYCEY total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ETN delivered 22.83% and RYCEY delivered 7.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ETN analysis Full RYCEY analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Eaton P/E ratio Rolls-Royce P/E ratio Eaton dividend yield Rolls-Royce dividend yield Eaton ROE Rolls-Royce ROE Eaton operating margin Rolls-Royce operating margin Eaton revenue growth Rolls-Royce revenue growth Eaton free cash flow Rolls-Royce free cash flow

Eaton & Rolls-Royce appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 28, 2026.