Which has the lower trailing P/E, ETN or PH?

PH has the lower trailing P/E: ETN trades at 35.37 and PH at 35.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ETN or PH?

Over the past five years, ETN grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.94% CAGR versus PH at 9.15%.

Does ETN or PH pay a bigger dividend?

ETN yields 1.18% and PH yields 0.78% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ETN or PH more profitable?

PH runs the higher net margin — ETN at 13.99% versus PH at 16.58%.

How have ETN and PH total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ETN delivered 21.94% and PH delivered 25.50% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

A side-by-side comparison of Eaton Corporation plc and Parker-Hannifin Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ETN

Eaton Corporation plc

$147.18B

$379.04IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 30, 2026, 9:30 AM EDT

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

$121.67B

$965.00IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 30, 2026, 9:30 AM EDT

Total return — ETN vs PH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

ETN +6544.6%PH +9885.2%PH compounded faster

ETN PH

ETN vs PH: by the numbers

•ETN is the larger company ($147.18B vs $121.67B market cap).
•PH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.09 vs 35.37 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PH converts more revenue to profit (16.58% vs 13.99% net margin).
•ETN grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.94% vs 9.15% CAGR).
•ETN pays the higher dividend yield (1.18% vs 0.78%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ETN	PH
P/E ratio	35.37	35.09
Forward P/E	27.12	30.38
P/S ratio	4.94	5.80
P/B ratio	7.13	8.33
PEG ratio	3.05	1.04
EV / EBITDA	26.07	24.65
FCF yield	3.33%	3.02%

Profitability

Metric	ETN	PH
Gross margin	36.89%	37.23%
Operating margin	18.13%	20.87%
Net margin	13.99%	16.58%
ROE	20.19%	23.82%
ROIC	13.14%	13.69%

Dividends

Metric	ETN	PH
Dividend yield	1.18%	0.78%
Payout ratio	40.80%	26.89%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ETN	PH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.94%	9.15%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.48%	24.00%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.57%	8.25%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	19.97%	26.81%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ETN or PH?: PH has the lower trailing P/E: ETN trades at 35.37 and PH at 35.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ETN or PH?: Over the past five years, ETN grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.94% CAGR versus PH at 9.15%.
Does ETN or PH pay a bigger dividend?: ETN yields 1.18% and PH yields 0.78% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ETN or PH more profitable?: PH runs the higher net margin — ETN at 13.99% versus PH at 16.58%.
How have ETN and PH total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ETN delivered 21.94% and PH delivered 25.50% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ETN analysis Full PH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Eaton P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio Eaton dividend yield Parker-Hannifin dividend yield Eaton ROE Parker-Hannifin ROE Eaton operating margin Parker-Hannifin operating margin Eaton revenue growth Parker-Hannifin revenue growth Eaton free cash flow Parker-Hannifin free cash flow

Eaton & Parker-Hannifin appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 30, 2026.