Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)
PH leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Eaton Corporation plc and Parker-Hannifin Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
$391.39Industrials
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$903.48Industrials
Total return — ETN vs PH
growth of $100 · last 30yETN +2981.8%PH +4888.8%PH compounded faster
ETN PH
ETN vs PH: by the numbers
- •ETN is the larger company ($151.98B vs $113.92B market cap).
- •PH trades at the lower earnings multiple (33.34 vs 38.26 P/E).
- •PH converts more revenue to profit (16.58% vs 13.99% net margin).
- •ETN grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.94% vs 9.15% CAGR).
- •ETN pays the higher dividend yield (1.09% vs 0.82%).
Which is better, ETN or PH?
Metric tally: ETN 6 · PH 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePH(lower P/E)
GrowthETN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeETN(higher dividend yield)
QualityPH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ETN | PH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 38.26 | 33.34● |
| Forward P/E | 24.99● | 26.53 |
| P/S ratio | 5.34● | 5.51 |
| P/B ratio | 7.71● | 7.92 |
| PEG ratio | 3.04 | 1.04● |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.86 | 22.16● |
| FCF yield | 3.08% | 3.18%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ETN | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.89% | 37.23% |
| Operating margin | 18.13% | 20.87%● |
| Net margin | 13.99% | 16.58%● |
| ROE | 20.19% | 23.82%● |
| ROIC | 13.14% | 13.69%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ETN | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.09%● | 0.82% |
| Payout ratio | 40.80% | 26.89% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ETN | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.94%● | 9.15% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.48% | 24.00% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 13.57%● | 8.25% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 23.64% | 26.11%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ETN or PH?
- It depends on your goal. value: PH (lower P/E); growth: ETN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ETN (higher dividend yield); quality: PH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PH leads 9 to 6.
- Is ETN or PH cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PH is cheaper: ETN trades at a 38.26 P/E and PH at 33.34.
- Which has grown faster, ETN or PH?
- Over the past five years, ETN grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.94% CAGR versus PH at 9.15%.
- Does ETN or PH pay a bigger dividend?
- ETN yields 1.09% and PH yields 0.82% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ETN or PH more profitable?
- PH runs the higher net margin — ETN at 13.99% versus PH at 16.58%.
- Which has been the better investment, ETN or PH?
- Over the past 10-year, PH delivered the higher annualized total return — ETN at 23.24% versus PH at 25.01%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Eaton P/E ratioParker-Hannifin P/E ratioEaton dividend yieldParker-Hannifin dividend yieldEaton ROEParker-Hannifin ROEEaton operating marginParker-Hannifin operating marginEaton revenue growthParker-Hannifin revenue growthEaton free cash flowParker-Hannifin free cash flow
Eaton & Parker-Hannifin appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.