Which has the lower trailing P/E, ETN or PH?

PH has the lower trailing P/E: ETN trades at 44.37 and PH at 34.14. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ETN or PH?

Over the past five years, ETN grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.45% CAGR versus PH at 8.43%.

Does ETN or PH pay a bigger dividend?

ETN yields 1.00% and PH yields 0.78% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ETN or PH more profitable?

PH runs the higher net margin — ETN at 12.76% versus PH at 16.97%.

How have ETN and PH total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ETN delivered 23.70% and PH delivered 24.55% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

A side-by-side comparison of Eaton Corporation plc and Parker-Hannifin Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ETN

Eaton Corporation plc

$169.34B

$436.11IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

$122.63B

$972.55IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ETN vs PH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ETN +760.4% (+24.0%/yr)PH +802.1% (+24.6%/yr)PH compounded faster over this window

ETN PH

ETN vs PH: by the numbers

•ETN is the larger company ($169.34B vs $122.63B market cap).
•PH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (34.14 vs 44.37 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PH converts more revenue to profit (16.97% vs 12.76% net margin).
•ETN grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.45% vs 8.43% CAGR).
•ETN pays the higher dividend yield (1.00% vs 0.78%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ETN	PH
P/E ratio	44.37	34.14
Forward P/E	32.15	27.53
PEG ratio	1.81	2.09
P/S ratio	5.64	5.70
P/B ratio	8.36	7.96
EV / EBITDA	29.30	23.87
FCF yield	2.32%	3.18%

Profitability

Metric	ETN	PH
Gross margin	35.90%	37.69%
Operating margin	17.68%	21.55%
Net margin	12.76%	16.97%
ROE	18.91%	23.68%
ROIC	9.09%	13.94%

Dividends

Metric	ETN	PH
Dividend yield	1.00%	0.78%
Payout ratio	44.15%	26.68%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ETN	PH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.45%	8.43%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.48%	16.37%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.31%	10.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	25.61%	28.83%

Some values include inputs from SEC filing.

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ETN or PH?: PH has the lower trailing P/E: ETN trades at 44.37 and PH at 34.14. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ETN or PH?: Over the past five years, ETN grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.45% CAGR versus PH at 8.43%.
Does ETN or PH pay a bigger dividend?: ETN yields 1.00% and PH yields 0.78% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ETN or PH more profitable?: PH runs the higher net margin — ETN at 12.76% versus PH at 16.97%.
How have ETN and PH total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ETN delivered 23.70% and PH delivered 24.55% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ETN analysis Full PH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Eaton P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio Eaton dividend yield Parker-Hannifin dividend yield Eaton ROE Parker-Hannifin ROE Eaton operating margin Parker-Hannifin operating margin Eaton revenue growth Parker-Hannifin revenue growth Eaton free cash flow Parker-Hannifin free cash flow

Eaton & Parker-Hannifin appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 3, 2026.