Energy Transfer LP (ET) vs The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB)
A side-by-side comparison of Energy Transfer LP and The Williams Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ET
Energy Transfer LP
$21.19EnergyAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
$70.49EnergyAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — ET vs WMB
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yET +168.7% (+10.4%/yr)WMB +349.7% (+16.2%/yr)WMB compounded faster over this window
ET WMB
ET vs WMB: by the numbers
- •WMB is the larger company ($86.22B vs $72.92B market cap).
- •ET trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.16 vs 27.97 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •WMB converts more revenue to profit (25.18% vs 5.57% net margin).
- •ET grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.94% vs 6.47% CAGR).
- •ET pays the higher dividend yield (6.35% vs 2.91%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ET | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.16 | 27.97 |
| Forward P/E | 12.64 | 28.75 |
| P/S ratio | 0.70 | 7.07 |
| P/B ratio | 2.08 | 6.54 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.49 | 16.65 |
| FCF yield | 7.11% | 0.83% |
Profitability
| Metric | ET | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 24.11% | 42.86% |
| Operating margin | 10.60% | 40.31% |
| Net margin | 5.57% | 25.18% |
| ROE | 16.47% | 23.30% |
| ROIC | 8.16% | 6.64% |
Dividends
| Metric | ET | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 6.35% | 2.91% |
| Payout ratio | 98.90% | 95.79% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ET | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.94% | 6.47% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.25% | 65.97% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.51% | -21.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 28.39% | 29.85% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ET or WMB?
- ET has the lower trailing P/E: ET trades at 13.16 and WMB at 27.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ET or WMB?
- Over the past five years, ET grew revenue faster — ET at a 14.94% CAGR versus WMB at 6.47%.
- Does ET or WMB pay a bigger dividend?
- ET yields 6.35% and WMB yields 2.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ET or WMB more profitable?
- WMB runs the higher net margin — ET at 5.57% versus WMB at 25.18%.
- How have ET and WMB total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ET delivered 10.40% and WMB delivered 15.62% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Energy Transfer LP P/E ratioWilliams Companies P/E ratioEnergy Transfer LP dividend yieldWilliams Companies dividend yieldEnergy Transfer LP ROEWilliams Companies ROEEnergy Transfer LP operating marginWilliams Companies operating marginEnergy Transfer LP revenue growthWilliams Companies revenue growthEnergy Transfer LP free cash flowWilliams Companies free cash flow
Energy Transfer LP & Williams Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.