On trailing earnings, ET is cheaper: ET trades at a 14.34 P/E and SU at 14.82.

Which has grown faster, ET or SU?

Over the past five years, ET grew revenue faster — ET at a 15.06% CAGR versus SU at 13.46%.

Does ET or SU pay a bigger dividend?

ET yields 6.95% and SU yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ET or SU more profitable?

SU runs the higher net margin — ET at 5.41% versus SU at 12.16%.

Which has been the better investment, ET or SU?

Over the past 10-year, ET delivered the higher annualized total return — ET at 11.87% versus SU at 11.54%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Energy Transfer LP (ET) vs Suncor Energy Inc. (SU)

SU leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics, though ET is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Energy Transfer LP and Suncor Energy Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — ET vs SU

growth of $100 · last 20y

ET +232.7%SU +41.9%ET compounded faster

ET SU

ET vs SU: by the numbers

•ET is the larger company ($66.14B vs $64.07B market cap).
•ET trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.34 vs 14.82 P/E).
•SU converts more revenue to profit (12.16% vs 5.41% net margin).
•ET grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.06% vs 13.46% CAGR).
•ET pays the higher dividend yield (6.95% vs 3.05%).

Which is better, ET or SU?

Metric tally: ET 6 · SU 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueET(lower P/E)

GrowthET(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeET(higher dividend yield)

QualitySU(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ET	SU
P/E ratio	14.34●	14.82
Forward P/E	12.09	7.72●
P/S ratio	0.74●	1.78
P/B ratio	1.93●	2.04
PEG ratio	2.23●	4.56
EV / EBITDA	9.30	6.37●
FCF yield	5.50%	7.79%●

Profitability

Metric	ET	SU
Gross margin	22.91%	55.48%●
Operating margin	11.11%	27.38%●
Net margin	5.41%	12.16%●
ROE	14.02%	13.92%
ROIC	7.17%	14.20%●

Dividends

Metric	ET	SU
Dividend yield	6.95%●	3.05%
Payout ratio	98.16%	48.74%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ET	SU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.06%●	13.46%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.25%	16.24%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-11.11%	82.96%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	21.42%	21.92%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, ET or SU?: It depends on your goal. value: ET (lower P/E); growth: ET (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ET (higher dividend yield); quality: SU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SU leads 10 to 6.
Is ET or SU cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ET is cheaper: ET trades at a 14.34 P/E and SU at 14.82.
Which has grown faster, ET or SU?: Over the past five years, ET grew revenue faster — ET at a 15.06% CAGR versus SU at 13.46%.
Does ET or SU pay a bigger dividend?: ET yields 6.95% and SU yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ET or SU more profitable?: SU runs the higher net margin — ET at 5.41% versus SU at 12.16%.
Which has been the better investment, ET or SU?: Over the past 10-year, ET delivered the higher annualized total return — ET at 11.87% versus SU at 11.54%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ET analysis Full SU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Energy Transfer LP P/E ratio Suncor Energy P/E ratio Energy Transfer LP dividend yield Suncor Energy dividend yield Energy Transfer LP ROE Suncor Energy ROE Energy Transfer LP operating margin Suncor Energy operating margin Energy Transfer LP revenue growth Suncor Energy revenue growth Energy Transfer LP free cash flow Suncor Energy free cash flow

Energy Transfer LP & Suncor Energy appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.