Which has the lower trailing P/E, ET or SU?

SU has the lower trailing P/E: ET trades at 12.67 and SU at 12.48. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ET or SU?

Over the past five years, ET grew revenue faster — ET at a 14.94% CAGR versus SU at 11.70%.

Does ET or SU pay a bigger dividend?

ET yields 6.24% and SU yields 2.50% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ET or SU more profitable?

SU runs the higher net margin — ET at 5.57% versus SU at 15.09%.

How have ET and SU total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ET delivered 10.54% and SU delivered 14.19% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Energy Transfer LP (ET) vs Suncor Energy Inc. (SU)

A side-by-side comparison of Energy Transfer LP and Suncor Energy Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Energy Transfer LP

$70.20B

$20.40EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Suncor Energy Inc.

$79.04B

$66.94EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ET vs SU

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ET +174.2% (+10.6%/yr)SU +268.5% (+13.9%/yr)SU compounded faster over this window

ET SU

ET vs SU: by the numbers

•SU is the larger company ($79.04B vs $70.20B market cap).
•SU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.48 vs 12.67 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SU converts more revenue to profit (15.09% vs 5.57% net margin).
•ET grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.94% vs 11.70% CAGR).
•ET pays the higher dividend yield (6.24% vs 2.50%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ET	SU
P/E ratio	12.67	12.48
Forward P/E	12.03	N/A
P/S ratio	0.67	1.87
P/B ratio	1.99	2.33
EV / EBITDA	8.30	5.08
FCF yield	7.43%	9.34%

Profitability

Metric	ET	SU
Gross margin	24.11%	54.01%
Operating margin	10.60%	27.54%
Net margin	5.57%	15.09%
ROE	16.47%	18.80%
ROIC	8.16%	14.57%

Dividends

Metric	ET	SU
Dividend yield	6.24%	2.50%
Payout ratio	83.54%	32.10%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ET	SU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.94%	11.70%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.25%	16.24%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.51%	30.76%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.04%	35.91%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ET or SU?: SU has the lower trailing P/E: ET trades at 12.67 and SU at 12.48. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ET or SU?: Over the past five years, ET grew revenue faster — ET at a 14.94% CAGR versus SU at 11.70%.
Does ET or SU pay a bigger dividend?: ET yields 6.24% and SU yields 2.50% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ET or SU more profitable?: SU runs the higher net margin — ET at 5.57% versus SU at 15.09%.
How have ET and SU total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ET delivered 10.54% and SU delivered 14.19% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ET analysis Full SU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Energy Transfer LP P/E ratio Suncor Energy P/E ratio Energy Transfer LP dividend yield Suncor Energy dividend yield Energy Transfer LP ROE Suncor Energy ROE Energy Transfer LP operating margin Suncor Energy operating margin Energy Transfer LP revenue growth Suncor Energy revenue growth Energy Transfer LP free cash flow Suncor Energy free cash flow

Energy Transfer LP & Suncor Energy appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.