Which has the lower trailing P/E, ET or SLB?

ET has the lower trailing P/E: ET trades at 12.67 and SLB at 25.42. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ET or SLB?

Over the past five years, ET grew revenue faster — ET at a 14.94% CAGR versus SLB at 10.93%.

Does ET or SLB pay a bigger dividend?

ET yields 6.24% and SLB yields 2.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ET or SLB more profitable?

SLB runs the higher net margin — ET at 5.57% versus SLB at 8.46%.

How have ET and SLB total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ET delivered 10.54% and SLB delivered -0.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Energy Transfer LP (ET) vs Slb N.V. (SLB)

A side-by-side comparison of Energy Transfer LP and Slb N.V. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Energy Transfer LP

$70.20B

$20.40EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SLB

Slb N.V.

$77.35B

$52.12EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ET vs SLB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ET +174.2% (+10.6%/yr)SLB -5.8% (-0.6%/yr)ET compounded faster over this window

ET SLB

ET vs SLB: by the numbers

•SLB is the larger company ($77.35B vs $70.20B market cap).
•ET trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.67 vs 25.42 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SLB converts more revenue to profit (8.46% vs 5.57% net margin).
•ET grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.94% vs 10.93% CAGR).
•ET pays the higher dividend yield (6.24% vs 2.09%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ET	SLB
P/E ratio	12.67	25.42
Forward P/E	12.03	21.03
P/S ratio	0.67	2.13
P/B ratio	1.99	2.97
EV / EBITDA	8.30	11.44
FCF yield	7.43%	5.89%

Profitability

Metric	ET	SLB
Gross margin	24.11%	16.53%
Operating margin	10.60%	13.40%
Net margin	5.57%	8.46%
ROE	16.47%	11.80%
ROIC	8.16%	9.15%

Dividends

Metric	ET	SLB
Dividend yield	6.24%	2.09%
Payout ratio	83.54%	57.07%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ET	SLB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.94%	10.93%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.25%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.51%	17.03%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.04%	18.51%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ET or SLB?: ET has the lower trailing P/E: ET trades at 12.67 and SLB at 25.42. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ET or SLB?: Over the past five years, ET grew revenue faster — ET at a 14.94% CAGR versus SLB at 10.93%.
Does ET or SLB pay a bigger dividend?: ET yields 6.24% and SLB yields 2.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ET or SLB more profitable?: SLB runs the higher net margin — ET at 5.57% versus SLB at 8.46%.
How have ET and SLB total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ET delivered 10.54% and SLB delivered -0.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ET analysis Full SLB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Energy Transfer LP P/E ratio Slb P/E ratio Energy Transfer LP dividend yield Slb dividend yield Energy Transfer LP ROE Slb ROE Energy Transfer LP operating margin Slb operating margin Energy Transfer LP revenue growth Slb revenue growth Energy Transfer LP free cash flow Slb free cash flow

Energy Transfer LP & Slb appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.