Energy Transfer LP (ET) vs Slb N.V. (SLB)
ET leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Energy Transfer LP and Slb N.V. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ET vs SLB
growth of $100 · last 20yET +232.7%SLB -22.4%ET compounded faster
ET SLB
ET vs SLB: by the numbers
- •SLB is the larger company ($71.45B vs $66.14B market cap).
- •ET trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.34 vs 21.05 P/E).
- •SLB converts more revenue to profit (9.20% vs 5.41% net margin).
- •ET grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.06% vs 10.96% CAGR).
- •ET pays the higher dividend yield (6.95% vs 2.43%).
Which is better, ET or SLB?
Metric tally: ET 11 · SLB 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueET(lower P/E)
GrowthET(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeET(higher dividend yield)
QualitySLB(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ET | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.34● | 21.05 |
| Forward P/E | 12.09● | 14.32 |
| P/S ratio | 0.74● | 2.01 |
| P/B ratio | 1.93● | 2.77 |
| PEG ratio | 2.23● | 3.28 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.30● | 10.97 |
| FCF yield | 5.50% | 6.46%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ET | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 22.91%● | 17.33% |
| Operating margin | 11.11% | 14.44%● |
| Net margin | 5.41% | 9.20%● |
| ROE | 14.02%● | 12.63% |
| ROIC | 7.17% | 10.34%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ET | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 6.95%● | 2.43% |
| Payout ratio | 98.16% | 48.74% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ET | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.06%● | 10.96% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.25% | 6.42%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -11.11% | 23.49%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.42%● | 10.17% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ET or SLB?
- It depends on your goal. value: ET (lower P/E); growth: ET (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ET (higher dividend yield); quality: SLB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ET leads 11 to 6.
- Is ET or SLB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ET is cheaper: ET trades at a 14.34 P/E and SLB at 21.05.
- Which has grown faster, ET or SLB?
- Over the past five years, ET grew revenue faster — ET at a 15.06% CAGR versus SLB at 10.96%.
- Does ET or SLB pay a bigger dividend?
- ET yields 6.95% and SLB yields 2.43% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ET or SLB more profitable?
- SLB runs the higher net margin — ET at 5.41% versus SLB at 9.20%.
- Which has been the better investment, ET or SLB?
- Over the past 10-year, ET delivered the higher annualized total return — ET at 11.87% versus SLB at -2.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Energy Transfer LP P/E ratioSlb P/E ratioEnergy Transfer LP dividend yieldSlb dividend yieldEnergy Transfer LP ROESlb ROEEnergy Transfer LP operating marginSlb operating marginEnergy Transfer LP revenue growthSlb revenue growthEnergy Transfer LP free cash flowSlb free cash flow
Energy Transfer LP & Slb appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.