Energy Transfer LP (ET) vs PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI)
A side-by-side comparison of Energy Transfer LP and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: ET is classified in Energy; PDI is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
ET
Energy Transfer LP
$20.19EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
$14.00Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ET vs PDI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yET +174.2% (+10.6%/yr)PDI +69.5% (+5.4%/yr)ET compounded faster over this window
ET PDI
ET vs PDI: by the numbers
- •ET is the larger company ($69.48B vs $6.46B market cap).
- •PDI converts more revenue to profit (64.09% vs 5.57% net margin).
- •PDI grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.34% vs 14.94% CAGR).
- •PDI pays the higher dividend yield (17.93% vs 6.24%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ET | PDI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.54 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | 11.91 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 0.67 | N/A |
| P/B ratio | 1.97 | 0.86 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.26 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 7.51% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | ET | PDI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 24.11% | 87.09% |
| Operating margin | 10.60% | 78.88% |
| Net margin | 5.57% | 64.09% |
| ROE | 16.47% | 7.79% |
| ROIC | 8.16% | N/A |
Dividends
| Metric | ET | PDI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 17.93% |
| Payout ratio | 83.54% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ET | PDI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.94% | 22.34% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.25% | -22.73% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.51% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 28.04% | 1.79% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, ET or PDI?
- Over the past five years, PDI grew revenue faster — ET at a 14.94% CAGR versus PDI at 22.34%.
- Does ET or PDI pay a bigger dividend?
- ET yields 6.24% and PDI yields 17.93% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ET or PDI more profitable?
- PDI runs the higher net margin — ET at 5.57% versus PDI at 64.09%.
- How have ET and PDI total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ET delivered 10.54% and PDI delivered 5.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Energy Transfer LP P/E ratioEnergy Transfer LP dividend yieldPIMCO Dynamic Income Fund dividend yieldEnergy Transfer LP ROEPIMCO Dynamic Income Fund ROEEnergy Transfer LP operating marginPIMCO Dynamic Income Fund operating marginEnergy Transfer LP revenue growthPIMCO Dynamic Income Fund revenue growthEnergy Transfer LP free cash flow
Energy Transfer LP & PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.