Which has the lower trailing P/E, ET or FANG?

ET has the lower trailing P/E: ET trades at 12.91 and FANG at 39.40. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ET or FANG?

Over the past five years, FANG grew revenue faster — ET at a 14.94% CAGR versus FANG at 31.48%.

Does ET or FANG pay a bigger dividend?

ET yields 6.42% and FANG yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ET or FANG more profitable?

FANG runs the higher net margin — ET at 5.57% versus FANG at 9.27%.

Energy Transfer LP (ET) vs Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG)

A side-by-side comparison of Energy Transfer LP and Diamondback Energy, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 12, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Energy Transfer LP

$72.09B

$20.95EnergyDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

FANG

Diamondback Energy, Inc.

$56.50B

$200.84EnergyDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ET vs FANG

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ET +183.2% (+11.0%/yr)FANG +173.7% (+10.6%/yr)ET compounded faster over this window

ET FANG

ET vs FANG: by the numbers

•ET is the larger company ($72.09B vs $56.50B market cap).
•ET trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.91 vs 39.40 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•FANG converts more revenue to profit (9.27% vs 5.57% net margin).
•FANG grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.48% vs 14.94% CAGR).
•ET pays the higher dividend yield (6.42% vs 2.06%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ET	FANG
P/E ratio	12.91	39.40
Forward P/E	13.30	10.18
P/S ratio	0.69	3.32
P/B ratio	2.04	1.50
EV / EBITDA	8.40	6.89
FCF yield	7.25%	11.45%

Profitability

Metric	ET	FANG
Gross margin	24.11%	35.16%
Operating margin	10.60%	27.68%
Net margin	5.57%	9.27%
ROE	16.47%	4.18%
ROIC	7.17%	6.00%

Dividends

Metric	ET	FANG
Dividend yield	6.42%	2.06%
Payout ratio	98.16%	72.43%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ET	FANG
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.94%	31.48%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.25%	25.44%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.51%	51.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	26.48%	25.73%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ET or FANG?: ET has the lower trailing P/E: ET trades at 12.91 and FANG at 39.40. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ET or FANG?: Over the past five years, FANG grew revenue faster — ET at a 14.94% CAGR versus FANG at 31.48%.
Does ET or FANG pay a bigger dividend?: ET yields 6.42% and FANG yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ET or FANG more profitable?: FANG runs the higher net margin — ET at 5.57% versus FANG at 9.27%.

Go deeper

Full ET analysis Full FANG analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Energy Transfer LP P/E ratio Diamondback Energy P/E ratio Energy Transfer LP dividend yield Diamondback Energy dividend yield Energy Transfer LP ROE Diamondback Energy ROE Energy Transfer LP operating margin Diamondback Energy operating margin Energy Transfer LP revenue growth Diamondback Energy revenue growth Energy Transfer LP free cash flow Diamondback Energy free cash flow

Energy Transfer LP & Diamondback Energy appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 12, 2026.