Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) vs Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ)
A side-by-side comparison of Escalade, Incorporated and Zumiez Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ESCA
Escalade, Incorporated
$18.59Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:55 PM EDT
ZUMZ
Zumiez Inc.
$13.96Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:50 PM EDT
Total return — ESCA vs ZUMZ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yESCA +128.1% (+8.6%/yr)ZUMZ -24.8% (-2.8%/yr)ESCA compounded faster over this window
ESCA ZUMZ
ESCA vs ZUMZ: by the numbers
- •ESCA is the larger company ($256M vs $235M market cap).
- •ESCA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.20 vs 19.38 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ESCA converts more revenue to profit (9.46% vs 1.36% net margin).
- •Both shrank revenue over the past five years; ESCA's decline was smaller (-3.58% vs -4.10% CAGR).
- •ESCA pays a dividend (3.18% yield), while ZUMZ has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ESCA | ZUMZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.20 | 19.38 |
| Forward P/E | 11.91 | 30.34 |
| P/S ratio | 1.05 | 0.25 |
| P/B ratio | 1.40 | 0.84 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.38 | 9.73 |
| FCF yield | 10.13% | 13.05% |
Profitability
| Metric | ESCA | ZUMZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 27.45% | 36.06% |
| Operating margin | 12.39% | 2.40% |
| Net margin | 9.46% | 1.36% |
| ROE | 12.63% | 4.55% |
| ROIC | 11.34% | 2.71% |
Dividends
| Metric | ESCA | ZUMZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 36.45% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ESCA | ZUMZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -3.58% | -4.10% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -11.48% | -23.52% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -23.73% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.44% | -19.35% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ESCA or ZUMZ?
- ESCA has the lower trailing P/E: ESCA trades at 11.20 and ZUMZ at 19.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ESCA or ZUMZ?
- Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with ESCA's decline the smaller — ESCA at a -3.58% CAGR versus ZUMZ at -4.10%.
- Does ESCA or ZUMZ pay a bigger dividend?
- ESCA pays a dividend (3.18% yield), while ZUMZ has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is ESCA or ZUMZ more profitable?
- ESCA runs the higher net margin — ESCA at 9.46% versus ZUMZ at 1.36%.
- How have ESCA and ZUMZ total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ESCA delivered 8.62% and ZUMZ delivered -2.82% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Escalade P/E ratioZumiez P/E ratioEscalade dividend yieldEscalade ROEZumiez ROEEscalade operating marginZumiez operating marginEscalade revenue growthZumiez revenue growthEscalade free cash flowZumiez free cash flow
Escalade & Zumiez appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.