Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) vs Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT)
A side-by-side comparison of Escalade, Incorporated and Lifetime Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ESCA
Escalade, Incorporated
$18.77Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:23 PM EDT
LCUT
Lifetime Brands, Inc.
$9.30Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:24 PM EDT
Total return — ESCA vs LCUT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yESCA +131.5% (+8.8%/yr)LCUT -18.2% (-2.0%/yr)ESCA compounded faster over this window
ESCA LCUT
ESCA vs LCUT: by the numbers
- •ESCA is the larger company ($258M vs $212M market cap).
- •LCUT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (6.48 vs 11.30 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ESCA converts more revenue to profit (9.46% vs 4.81% net margin).
- •Both shrank revenue over the past five years; ESCA's decline was smaller (-3.58% vs -5.04% CAGR).
- •ESCA pays the higher dividend yield (3.18% vs 1.88%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ESCA | LCUT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.30 | 6.48 |
| Forward P/E | 12.03 | 4.48 |
| P/S ratio | 1.06 | 0.32 |
| P/B ratio | 1.41 | 0.98 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.46 | 5.95 |
| FCF yield | 10.03% | 9.78% |
Profitability
| Metric | ESCA | LCUT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 27.45% | 43.36% |
| Operating margin | 12.39% | 8.79% |
| Net margin | 9.46% | 4.81% |
| ROE | 12.63% | 14.62% |
| ROIC | 11.34% | 10.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | ESCA | LCUT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | 1.88% |
| Payout ratio | 36.45% | 11.85% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ESCA | LCUT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -3.58% | -5.04% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -11.48% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -40.25% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.44% | -9.84% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ESCA or LCUT?
- LCUT has the lower trailing P/E: ESCA trades at 11.30 and LCUT at 6.48. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ESCA or LCUT?
- Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with ESCA's decline the smaller — ESCA at a -3.58% CAGR versus LCUT at -5.04%.
- Does ESCA or LCUT pay a bigger dividend?
- ESCA yields 3.18% and LCUT yields 1.88% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ESCA or LCUT more profitable?
- ESCA runs the higher net margin — ESCA at 9.46% versus LCUT at 4.81%.
- How have ESCA and LCUT total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ESCA delivered 8.62% and LCUT delivered -1.55% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Escalade P/E ratioLifetime Brands P/E ratioEscalade dividend yieldLifetime Brands dividend yieldEscalade ROELifetime Brands ROEEscalade operating marginLifetime Brands operating marginEscalade revenue growthLifetime Brands revenue growthEscalade free cash flowLifetime Brands free cash flow
Escalade & Lifetime Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.