Which has grown faster, ESCA or FOSL?

Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with ESCA's decline the smaller — ESCA at a -3.58% CAGR versus FOSL at -10.72%.

Does ESCA or FOSL pay a bigger dividend?

ESCA pays a dividend (3.18% yield), while FOSL has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is ESCA or FOSL more profitable?

ESCA runs the higher net margin — ESCA at 9.46% versus FOSL at -7.09%.

How have ESCA and FOSL total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ESCA delivered 8.62% and FOSL delivered -13.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) vs Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL)

A side-by-side comparison of Escalade, Incorporated and Fossil Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ESCA

Escalade, Incorporated

$253M

$18.37Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:04 AM EDT

FOSL

Fossil Group, Inc.

$431M

$7.29Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:05 AM EDT

Total return — ESCA vs FOSL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ESCA +131.5% (+8.8%/yr)FOSL -74.7% (-12.8%/yr)ESCA compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ESCA FOSL

ESCA vs FOSL: by the numbers

•FOSL is the larger company ($431M vs $253M market cap).
•ESCA is profitable (9.46% net margin) while FOSL runs a net loss (-7.09%).
•Both shrank revenue over the past five years; ESCA's decline was smaller (-3.58% vs -10.72% CAGR).
•ESCA pays a dividend (3.18% yield), while FOSL has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ESCA	FOSL
P/E ratio	11.07	N/A
Forward P/E	11.78	N/A
P/S ratio	1.04	0.44
P/B ratio	1.38	4.79
EV / EBITDA	7.30	25.75
FCF yield	10.25%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	ESCA	FOSL
Gross margin	27.45%	56.73%
Operating margin	12.39%	1.58%
Net margin	9.46%	-7.09%
ROE	12.63%	-77.74%
ROIC	11.34%	3.84%

Dividends

Metric	ESCA	FOSL
Dividend yield	3.18%	N/A
Payout ratio	36.45%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ESCA	FOSL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-3.58%	-10.72%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-11.48%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.44%	-10.05%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, ESCA or FOSL?: Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with ESCA's decline the smaller — ESCA at a -3.58% CAGR versus FOSL at -10.72%.
Does ESCA or FOSL pay a bigger dividend?: ESCA pays a dividend (3.18% yield), while FOSL has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is ESCA or FOSL more profitable?: ESCA runs the higher net margin — ESCA at 9.46% versus FOSL at -7.09%.
How have ESCA and FOSL total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ESCA delivered 8.62% and FOSL delivered -13.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ESCA analysis Full FOSL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Escalade P/E ratio Escalade dividend yield Escalade ROE Fossil ROE Escalade operating margin Fossil operating margin Escalade revenue growth Fossil revenue growth Escalade free cash flow Fossil free cash flow

Escalade & Fossil appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.