Which has grown faster, ESCA or FLWS?

Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with ESCA's decline the smaller — ESCA at a -3.58% CAGR versus FLWS at -5.76%.

Does ESCA or FLWS pay a bigger dividend?

ESCA pays a dividend (3.18% yield), while FLWS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is ESCA or FLWS more profitable?

ESCA runs the higher net margin — ESCA at 9.46% versus FLWS at -8.96%.

How have ESCA and FLWS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ESCA delivered 8.62% and FLWS delivered -12.14% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) vs 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (FLWS)

A side-by-side comparison of Escalade, Incorporated and 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ESCA

Escalade, Incorporated

$259M

$18.82Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:00 PM EDT

FLWS

1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.

$165M

$2.59Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:59 AM EDT

Total return — ESCA vs FLWS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ESCA +128.1% (+8.6%/yr)FLWS -72.3% (-12.0%/yr)ESCA compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ESCA FLWS

ESCA vs FLWS: by the numbers

•ESCA is the larger company ($259M vs $165M market cap).
•ESCA is profitable (9.46% net margin) while FLWS runs a net loss (-8.96%).
•Both shrank revenue over the past five years; ESCA's decline was smaller (-3.58% vs -5.76% CAGR).
•ESCA pays a dividend (3.18% yield), while FLWS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ESCA	FLWS
P/E ratio	11.33	N/A
Forward P/E	12.06	N/A
P/S ratio	1.06	0.11
P/B ratio	1.42	1.15
EV / EBITDA	7.48	N/A
FCF yield	10.01%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	ESCA	FLWS
Gross margin	27.45%	38.00%
Operating margin	12.39%	-5.40%
Net margin	9.46%	-8.96%
ROE	12.63%	-93.81%
ROIC	11.34%	-18.82%

Dividends

Metric	ESCA	FLWS
Dividend yield	3.18%	N/A
Payout ratio	36.45%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ESCA	FLWS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-3.58%	-5.76%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-11.48%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.44%	-39.41%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, ESCA or FLWS?: Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with ESCA's decline the smaller — ESCA at a -3.58% CAGR versus FLWS at -5.76%.
Does ESCA or FLWS pay a bigger dividend?: ESCA pays a dividend (3.18% yield), while FLWS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is ESCA or FLWS more profitable?: ESCA runs the higher net margin — ESCA at 9.46% versus FLWS at -8.96%.
How have ESCA and FLWS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ESCA delivered 8.62% and FLWS delivered -12.14% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ESCA analysis Full FLWS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Escalade P/E ratio Escalade dividend yield Escalade ROE 1-800-FLOWERS.COM ROE Escalade operating margin 1-800-FLOWERS.COM operating margin Escalade revenue growth 1-800-FLOWERS.COM revenue growth Escalade free cash flow 1-800-FLOWERS.COM free cash flow

Escalade & 1-800-FLOWERS.COM appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.