EQT Corporation (EQT) vs Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL)
EQT leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of EQT Corporation and Texas Pacific Land Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — EQT vs TPL
growth of $100 · last 30yEQT +1283.2%TPL +60480.4%TPL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
EQT TPL
EQT vs TPL: by the numbers
- •EQT is the larger company ($32.96B vs $27.30B market cap).
- •EQT trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.76 vs 54.27 P/E).
- •TPL converts more revenue to profit (60.03% vs 33.40% net margin).
- •EQT grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.65% vs 23.67% CAGR).
- •EQT pays the higher dividend yield (1.25% vs 0.61%).
Which is better, EQT or TPL?
Metric tally: EQT 11 · TPL 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueEQT(lower P/E)
GrowthEQT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeEQT(higher dividend yield)
QualityTPL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EQT | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.76● | 54.27 |
| Forward P/E | 11.56● | 43.17 |
| P/S ratio | 3.28● | 32.55 |
| P/B ratio | 1.31● | 17.55 |
| PEG ratio | 0.03● | 6.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.24● | 39.30 |
| FCF yield | 12.33%● | 1.81% |
Profitability
| Metric | EQT | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.86% | 85.46%● |
| Operating margin | 34.70% | 74.42%● |
| Net margin | 33.40% | 60.03%● |
| ROE | 13.34% | 32.37%● |
| ROIC | 6.18% | 30.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | EQT | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.25%● | 0.61% |
| Payout ratio | 19.82% | 34.38% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EQT | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 26.65%● | 23.67% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -10.45% | 22.57%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 58.98%● | 18.77% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 20.54%● | 18.39% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, EQT or TPL?
- It depends on your goal. value: EQT (lower P/E); growth: EQT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: EQT (higher dividend yield); quality: TPL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EQT leads 11 to 6.
- Is EQT or TPL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, EQT is cheaper: EQT trades at a 9.76 P/E and TPL at 54.27.
- Which has grown faster, EQT or TPL?
- Over the past five years, EQT grew revenue faster — EQT at a 26.65% CAGR versus TPL at 23.67%.
- Does EQT or TPL pay a bigger dividend?
- EQT yields 1.25% and TPL yields 0.61% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EQT or TPL more profitable?
- TPL runs the higher net margin — EQT at 33.40% versus TPL at 60.03%.
- Which has been the better investment, EQT or TPL?
- Over the past 10-year, TPL delivered the higher annualized total return — EQT at 3.16% versus TPL at 37.72%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
EQT P/E ratioTexas Pacific Land P/E ratioEQT dividend yieldTexas Pacific Land dividend yieldEQT ROETexas Pacific Land ROEEQT operating marginTexas Pacific Land operating marginEQT revenue growthTexas Pacific Land revenue growthEQT free cash flowTexas Pacific Land free cash flow
EQT & Texas Pacific Land appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.