Which has the lower trailing P/E, EQT or PBA?

EQT has the lower trailing P/E: EQT trades at 12.06 and PBA at 23.85. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EQT or PBA?

Over the past five years, EQT grew revenue faster — EQT at a 20.44% CAGR versus PBA at 0.33%.

Does EQT or PBA pay a bigger dividend?

EQT yields 1.21% and PBA yields 4.29% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is EQT or PBA more profitable?

EQT runs the higher net margin — EQT at 30.68% versus PBA at 22.54%.

How have EQT and PBA total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, EQT delivered 4.40% and PBA delivered 10.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

EQT Corporation (EQT) vs Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA)

A side-by-side comparison of EQT Corporation and Pembina Pipeline Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EQT

EQT Corporation

$34.13B

$54.57EnergyDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 4:01 PM EDT

PBA

Pembina Pipeline Corporation

$27.91B

$48.01EnergyDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — EQT vs PBA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

EQT +54.1% (+4.4%/yr)PBA +177.2% (+10.7%/yr)PBA compounded faster over this window

EQT PBA

EQT vs PBA: by the numbers

•EQT is the larger company ($34.13B vs $27.91B market cap).
•EQT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.06 vs 23.85 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•EQT converts more revenue to profit (30.68% vs 22.54% net margin).
•EQT grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.44% vs 0.33% CAGR).
•PBA pays the higher dividend yield (4.29% vs 1.21%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EQT	PBA
P/E ratio	12.06	23.85
Forward P/E	13.23	15.24
P/S ratio	3.69	4.96
P/B ratio	1.36	2.34
EV / EBITDA	5.93	14.29
FCF yield	10.99%	5.27%

Profitability

Metric	EQT	PBA
Gross margin	48.86%	39.62%
Operating margin	34.70%	34.04%
Net margin	30.68%	22.54%
ROE	11.28%	10.66%
ROIC	7.85%	6.05%

Dividends

Metric	EQT	PBA
Dividend yield	1.21%	4.29%
Payout ratio	19.82%	107.09%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EQT	PBA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	20.44%	0.33%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	157.06%	2.92%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	25.86%	15.23%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EQT or PBA?: EQT has the lower trailing P/E: EQT trades at 12.06 and PBA at 23.85. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EQT or PBA?: Over the past five years, EQT grew revenue faster — EQT at a 20.44% CAGR versus PBA at 0.33%.
Does EQT or PBA pay a bigger dividend?: EQT yields 1.21% and PBA yields 4.29% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is EQT or PBA more profitable?: EQT runs the higher net margin — EQT at 30.68% versus PBA at 22.54%.
How have EQT and PBA total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, EQT delivered 4.40% and PBA delivered 10.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EQT analysis Full PBA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

EQT P/E ratio Pembina Pipeline P/E ratio EQT dividend yield Pembina Pipeline dividend yield EQT ROE Pembina Pipeline ROE EQT operating margin Pembina Pipeline operating margin EQT revenue growth Pembina Pipeline revenue growth EQT free cash flow Pembina Pipeline free cash flow

EQT & Pembina Pipeline appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 28, 2026.