Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAM or PATH?

EPAM has the lower trailing P/E: EPAM trades at 15.92 and PATH at 20.60. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EPAM or PATH?

Over the past five years, PATH grew revenue faster — EPAM at a 13.08% CAGR versus PATH at 18.49%.

Is EPAM or PATH more profitable?

PATH runs the higher net margin — EPAM at 7.15% versus PATH at 21.03%.

How have EPAM and PATH total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, EPAM delivered -28.40% and PATH delivered -24.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) vs UiPath Inc. (PATH)

A side-by-side comparison of EPAM Systems, Inc. and UiPath Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EPAM

EPAM Systems, Inc.

$6.14B

$117.47TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 17, 2026, 12:35 PM EDT

PATH

UiPath Inc.

$7.34B

$13.81TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 17, 2026, 12:35 PM EDT

Total return — EPAM vs PATH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

EPAM -73.6% (-23.4%/yr)PATH -80.1% (-27.6%/yr)EPAM compounded faster over this window

EPAM PATH

EPAM vs PATH: by the numbers

•PATH is the larger company ($7.34B vs $6.14B market cap).
•EPAM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (15.92 vs 20.60 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PATH converts more revenue to profit (21.03% vs 7.15% net margin).
•PATH grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.49% vs 13.08% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EPAM	PATH
P/E ratio	15.92	20.60
Forward P/E	8.94	17.57
P/S ratio	1.09	4.27
P/B ratio	1.74	3.77
EV / EBITDA	7.72	37.52
FCF yield	7.86%	4.94%

Profitability

Metric	EPAM	PATH
Gross margin	28.33%	82.50%
Operating margin	10.26%	9.03%
Net margin	7.15%	21.03%
ROE	11.42%	18.57%
ROIC	11.07%	7.40%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EPAM	PATH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.08%	18.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	2.86%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.36%	60.31%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-28.40%	-24.30%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAM or PATH?: EPAM has the lower trailing P/E: EPAM trades at 15.92 and PATH at 20.60. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EPAM or PATH?: Over the past five years, PATH grew revenue faster — EPAM at a 13.08% CAGR versus PATH at 18.49%.
Is EPAM or PATH more profitable?: PATH runs the higher net margin — EPAM at 7.15% versus PATH at 21.03%.
How have EPAM and PATH total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, EPAM delivered -28.40% and PATH delivered -24.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EPAM analysis Full PATH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

EPAM Systems P/E ratio UiPath P/E ratio EPAM Systems ROE UiPath ROE EPAM Systems operating margin UiPath operating margin EPAM Systems revenue growth UiPath revenue growth EPAM Systems free cash flow UiPath free cash flow

EPAM Systems & UiPath appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.