Is EPAM or PATH cheaper?

On trailing earnings, EPAM is cheaper: EPAM trades at a 13.68 P/E and PATH at 17.50.

Which has grown faster, EPAM or PATH?

Over the past five years, PATH grew revenue faster — EPAM at a 14.78% CAGR versus PATH at 19.70%.

Is EPAM or PATH more profitable?

PATH runs the higher net margin — EPAM at 6.96% versus PATH at 19.58%.

Which has been the better investment, EPAM or PATH?

Over the past 5-year, EPAM delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAM at 2.92% versus PATH at -31.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) vs UiPath Inc. (PATH)

EPAM leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of EPAM Systems, Inc. and UiPath Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — EPAM vs PATH

growth of $100 · last 5y

EPAM -78.7%PATH -84.7%EPAM compounded faster

EPAM PATH

EPAM vs PATH: by the numbers

•PATH is the larger company ($5.61B vs $4.98B market cap).
•EPAM trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.68 vs 17.50 P/E).
•PATH converts more revenue to profit (19.58% vs 6.96% net margin).
•PATH grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.70% vs 14.78% CAGR).

Which is better, EPAM or PATH?

Metric tally: EPAM 9 · PATH 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueEPAM(lower P/E)

GrowthPATH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityEPAM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EPAM	PATH
P/E ratio	13.68●	17.50
Forward P/E	7.31●	15.66
P/S ratio	0.93●	3.33
P/B ratio	1.51●	2.93
PEG ratio	4.78	—
EV / EBITDA	6.52●	31.33
FCF yield	10.52%●	6.74%

Profitability

Metric	EPAM	PATH
Gross margin	27.92%	82.96%●
Operating margin	9.91%●	6.19%
Net margin	6.96%	19.58%●
ROE	11.27%	17.21%●
ROIC	9.82%●	2.68%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EPAM	PATH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.78%	19.70%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	2.86%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.18%	65.27%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-28.44%●	-31.79%

Frequently asked

Which is better, EPAM or PATH?: It depends on your goal. value: EPAM (lower P/E); growth: PATH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: EPAM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EPAM leads 9 to 5.
Is EPAM or PATH cheaper?: On trailing earnings, EPAM is cheaper: EPAM trades at a 13.68 P/E and PATH at 17.50.
Which has grown faster, EPAM or PATH?: Over the past five years, PATH grew revenue faster — EPAM at a 14.78% CAGR versus PATH at 19.70%.
Is EPAM or PATH more profitable?: PATH runs the higher net margin — EPAM at 6.96% versus PATH at 19.58%.
Which has been the better investment, EPAM or PATH?: Over the past 5-year, EPAM delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAM at 2.92% versus PATH at -31.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EPAM analysis Full PATH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

EPAM Systems P/E ratio UiPath P/E ratio EPAM Systems dividend yield UiPath dividend yield EPAM Systems ROE UiPath ROE EPAM Systems operating margin UiPath operating margin EPAM Systems revenue growth UiPath revenue growth EPAM Systems free cash flow UiPath free cash flow

EPAM Systems & UiPath appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.