Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAM or LYFT?

LYFT has the lower trailing P/E: EPAM trades at 14.40 and LYFT at 2.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EPAM or LYFT?

Over the past five years, LYFT grew revenue faster — EPAM at a 14.78% CAGR versus LYFT at 26.43%.

Is EPAM or LYFT more profitable?

LYFT runs the higher net margin — EPAM at 6.96% versus LYFT at 43.82%.

How have EPAM and LYFT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, EPAM delivered 3.62% and LYFT delivered -22.64% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) vs Lyft, Inc. (LYFT)

A side-by-side comparison of EPAM Systems, Inc. and Lyft, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EPAM

EPAM Systems, Inc.

$5.58B

$106.89TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

LYFT

Lyft, Inc.

$5.86B

$15.44TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — EPAM vs LYFT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

EPAM -41.0%LYFT -80.3%EPAM compounded faster

EPAM LYFT

EPAM vs LYFT: by the numbers

•LYFT is the larger company ($5.86B vs $5.58B market cap).
•LYFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.26 vs 14.40 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LYFT converts more revenue to profit (43.82% vs 6.96% net margin).
•LYFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.43% vs 14.78% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EPAM	LYFT
P/E ratio	14.40	2.26
Forward P/E	7.70	26.25
P/S ratio	0.98	0.95
P/B ratio	1.59	2.06
PEG ratio	5.04	N/A
EV / EBITDA	6.74	N/A
FCF yield	9.99%	18.59%

Profitability

Metric	EPAM	LYFT
Gross margin	27.92%	43.24%
Operating margin	9.91%	-2.53%
Net margin	6.96%	43.82%
ROE	11.27%	94.37%
ROIC	9.82%	217.84%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EPAM	LYFT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.78%	26.43%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	2.86%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.18%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-28.91%	-22.64%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAM or LYFT?: LYFT has the lower trailing P/E: EPAM trades at 14.40 and LYFT at 2.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EPAM or LYFT?: Over the past five years, LYFT grew revenue faster — EPAM at a 14.78% CAGR versus LYFT at 26.43%.
Is EPAM or LYFT more profitable?: LYFT runs the higher net margin — EPAM at 6.96% versus LYFT at 43.82%.
How have EPAM and LYFT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, EPAM delivered 3.62% and LYFT delivered -22.64% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EPAM analysis Full LYFT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

EPAM Systems P/E ratio Lyft P/E ratio EPAM Systems dividend yield Lyft dividend yield EPAM Systems ROE Lyft ROE EPAM Systems operating margin Lyft operating margin EPAM Systems revenue growth Lyft revenue growth EPAM Systems free cash flow Lyft free cash flow

EPAM Systems & Lyft appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.