Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAM or KLIC?

EPAM has the lower trailing P/E: EPAM trades at 14.57 and KLIC at 42.25. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EPAM or KLIC?

Over the past five years, EPAM grew revenue faster — EPAM at a 13.08% CAGR versus KLIC at -4.72%.

Does EPAM or KLIC pay a bigger dividend?

KLIC pays a dividend (0.95% yield), while EPAM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is EPAM or KLIC more profitable?

KLIC runs the higher net margin — EPAM at 7.15% versus KLIC at 12.18%.

How have EPAM and KLIC total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, EPAM delivered 5.64% and KLIC delivered 23.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) vs Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC)

A side-by-side comparison of EPAM Systems, Inc. and Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EPAM

EPAM Systems, Inc.

$5.62B

$107.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

KLIC

Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.

$4.80B

$91.68TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — EPAM vs KLIC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

EPAM +75.5% (+5.8%/yr)KLIC +702.7% (+23.2%/yr)KLIC compounded faster over this window

EPAM KLIC

EPAM vs KLIC: by the numbers

•EPAM is the larger company ($5.62B vs $4.80B market cap).
•EPAM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.57 vs 42.25 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•KLIC converts more revenue to profit (12.18% vs 7.15% net margin).
•EPAM grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.08% vs -4.72% CAGR).
•KLIC pays a dividend (0.95% yield), while EPAM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EPAM	KLIC
P/E ratio	14.57	42.25
Forward P/E	8.18	23.73
P/S ratio	1.00	5.05
P/B ratio	1.60	5.26
EV / EBITDA	6.99	31.17
FCF yield	8.59%	0.83%

Profitability

Metric	EPAM	KLIC
Gross margin	28.33%	48.18%
Operating margin	10.26%	-0.49%
Net margin	7.15%	12.18%
ROE	11.42%	12.69%
ROIC	11.07%	10.22%

Dividends

Metric	EPAM	KLIC
Dividend yield	N/A	0.95%
Payout ratio	N/A	37.79%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EPAM	KLIC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.08%	-4.72%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	2.86%	-65.58%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.36%	-26.60%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-28.40%	5.17%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAM or KLIC?: EPAM has the lower trailing P/E: EPAM trades at 14.57 and KLIC at 42.25. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EPAM or KLIC?: Over the past five years, EPAM grew revenue faster — EPAM at a 13.08% CAGR versus KLIC at -4.72%.
Does EPAM or KLIC pay a bigger dividend?: KLIC pays a dividend (0.95% yield), while EPAM has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is EPAM or KLIC more profitable?: KLIC runs the higher net margin — EPAM at 7.15% versus KLIC at 12.18%.
How have EPAM and KLIC total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, EPAM delivered 5.64% and KLIC delivered 23.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EPAM analysis Full KLIC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

EPAM Systems P/E ratio Kulicke and Soffa Industries P/E ratio Kulicke and Soffa Industries dividend yield EPAM Systems ROE Kulicke and Soffa Industries ROE EPAM Systems operating margin Kulicke and Soffa Industries operating margin EPAM Systems revenue growth Kulicke and Soffa Industries revenue growth EPAM Systems free cash flow Kulicke and Soffa Industries free cash flow

EPAM Systems & Kulicke and Soffa Industries appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.