EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) vs Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC)
A side-by-side comparison of EPAM Systems, Inc. and Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 14, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
$100.70TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 14, 2026, 3:00 PM EDT
KLIC
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
$97.23TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 14, 2026, 3:00 PM EDT
Total return — EPAM vs KLIC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yEPAM +50.1% (+4.1%/yr)KLIC +764.9% (+24.1%/yr)KLIC compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
EPAM KLIC
EPAM vs KLIC: by the numbers
- •EPAM is the larger company ($5.26B vs $5.09B market cap).
- •EPAM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.76 vs 44.15 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •KLIC converts more revenue to profit (12.18% vs 7.15% net margin).
- •EPAM grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.08% vs -4.72% CAGR).
- •KLIC pays a dividend (0.86% yield), while EPAM has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EPAM | KLIC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.76 | 44.15 |
| Forward P/E | 7.79 | 28.07 |
| P/S ratio | 0.95 | 5.39 |
| P/B ratio | 1.51 | 5.61 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.56 | 33.41 |
| FCF yield | 9.09% | 0.78% |
Profitability
| Metric | EPAM | KLIC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 28.33% | 48.18% |
| Operating margin | 10.26% | -0.49% |
| Net margin | 7.15% | 12.18% |
| ROE | 11.42% | 12.69% |
| ROIC | 9.82% | 0.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | EPAM | KLIC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.86% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 20500.00% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EPAM | KLIC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 13.08% | -4.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 2.86% | -65.58% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.36% | -26.60% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -30.09% | 10.03% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAM or KLIC?
- EPAM has the lower trailing P/E: EPAM trades at 13.76 and KLIC at 44.15. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EPAM or KLIC?
- Over the past five years, EPAM grew revenue faster — EPAM at a 13.08% CAGR versus KLIC at -4.72%.
- Does EPAM or KLIC pay a bigger dividend?
- KLIC pays a dividend (0.86% yield), while EPAM has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is EPAM or KLIC more profitable?
- KLIC runs the higher net margin — EPAM at 7.15% versus KLIC at 12.18%.
- How have EPAM and KLIC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, EPAM delivered 4.03% and KLIC delivered 24.01% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
EPAM Systems P/E ratioKulicke and Soffa Industries P/E ratioKulicke and Soffa Industries dividend yieldEPAM Systems ROEKulicke and Soffa Industries ROEEPAM Systems operating marginKulicke and Soffa Industries operating marginEPAM Systems revenue growthKulicke and Soffa Industries revenue growthEPAM Systems free cash flowKulicke and Soffa Industries free cash flow
EPAM Systems & Kulicke and Soffa Industries appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 14, 2026.