Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAC or VRT?

EPAC has the lower trailing P/E: EPAC trades at 19.71 and VRT at 72.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EPAC or VRT?

Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 5.10% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.

Does EPAC or VRT pay a bigger dividend?

EPAC yields 0.11% and VRT yields 0.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is EPAC or VRT more profitable?

EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 14.72% versus VRT at 14.37%.

How have EPAC and VRT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, EPAC delivered 3.89% and VRT delivered 59.88% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EPAC

Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

$1.91B

$37.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

VRT

Vertiv Holdings Co

$103.54B

$269.56IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — EPAC vs VRT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

EPAC +24.2%VRT +2835.1%VRT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

EPAC VRT

EPAC vs VRT: by the numbers

•VRT is the larger company ($103.54B vs $1.91B market cap).
•EPAC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.71 vs 72.26 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•EPAC converts more revenue to profit (14.72% vs 14.37% net margin).
•VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.86% vs 5.10% CAGR).
•EPAC pays the higher dividend yield (0.11% vs 0.08%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EPAC	VRT
P/E ratio	19.71	72.26
Forward P/E	18.70	44.34
P/S ratio	2.84	10.40
P/B ratio	4.24	26.57
PEG ratio	2.78	0.28
EV / EBITDA	11.97	48.36
FCF yield	6.24%	2.05%

Profitability

Metric	EPAC	VRT
Gross margin	49.05%	36.16%
Operating margin	21.76%	18.54%
Net margin	14.72%	14.37%
ROE	22.01%	36.71%
ROIC	15.12%	18.55%

Dividends

Metric	EPAC	VRT
Dividend yield	0.11%	0.08%
Payout ratio	2.33%	6.45%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EPAC	VRT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.10%	18.86%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	169.53%	79.41%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	34.85%	41.85%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.62%	59.88%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAC or VRT?: EPAC has the lower trailing P/E: EPAC trades at 19.71 and VRT at 72.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EPAC or VRT?: Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 5.10% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.
Does EPAC or VRT pay a bigger dividend?: EPAC yields 0.11% and VRT yields 0.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is EPAC or VRT more profitable?: EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 14.72% versus VRT at 14.37%.
How have EPAC and VRT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, EPAC delivered 3.89% and VRT delivered 59.88% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EPAC analysis Full VRT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Enerpac Tool P/E ratio Vertiv P/E ratio Enerpac Tool dividend yield Vertiv dividend yield Enerpac Tool ROE Vertiv ROE Enerpac Tool operating margin Vertiv operating margin Enerpac Tool revenue growth Vertiv revenue growth Enerpac Tool free cash flow Vertiv free cash flow

Enerpac Tool & Vertiv appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.