Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA)
A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and Ulta Beauty, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: EPAC is classified in Industrials; ULTA is classified in Consumer Cyclical. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$37.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
ULTA
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
$501.52Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — EPAC vs ULTA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 19yEPAC +5.6%ULTA +1529.6%ULTA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
EPAC ULTA
EPAC vs ULTA: by the numbers
- •ULTA is the larger company ($21.56B vs $1.91B market cap).
- •ULTA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.01 vs 19.71 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EPAC converts more revenue to profit (14.72% vs 9.36% net margin).
- •ULTA grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.93% vs 5.10% CAGR).
- •EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while ULTA is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EPAC | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.71 | 18.01 |
| Forward P/E | 18.70 | 18.70 |
| P/S ratio | 2.84 | 1.66 |
| P/B ratio | 4.24 | 8.19 |
| PEG ratio | 2.78 | 22.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.97 | 12.22 |
| FCF yield | 6.24% | 4.96% |
Profitability
| Metric | EPAC | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.05% | 39.33% |
| Operating margin | 21.76% | 12.54% |
| Net margin | 14.72% | 9.36% |
| ROE | 22.01% | 46.06% |
| ROIC | 15.12% | 22.76% |
Dividends
| Metric | EPAC | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.11% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 2.33% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EPAC | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.10% | 12.93% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 169.53% | 52.49% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 34.85% | 10.16% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.62% | 7.32% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAC or ULTA?
- ULTA has the lower trailing P/E: EPAC trades at 19.71 and ULTA at 18.01. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EPAC or ULTA?
- Over the past five years, ULTA grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 5.10% CAGR versus ULTA at 12.93%.
- Does EPAC or ULTA pay a bigger dividend?
- EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while ULTA is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is EPAC or ULTA more profitable?
- EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 14.72% versus ULTA at 9.36%.
- How have EPAC and ULTA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, EPAC delivered 3.89% and ULTA delivered 6.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Enerpac Tool P/E ratioUlta Beauty P/E ratioEnerpac Tool dividend yieldUlta Beauty dividend yieldEnerpac Tool ROEUlta Beauty ROEEnerpac Tool operating marginUlta Beauty operating marginEnerpac Tool revenue growthUlta Beauty revenue growthEnerpac Tool free cash flowUlta Beauty free cash flow
Enerpac Tool & Ulta Beauty appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.