Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN)
TRN leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and Trinity Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$35.05Industrials
TRN
Trinity Industries, Inc.
$34.76Industrials
Total return — EPAC vs TRN
growth of $100 · last 30yEPAC +2477.2%TRN +313.8%EPAC compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
EPAC TRN
EPAC vs TRN: by the numbers
- •TRN is the larger company ($2.76B vs $1.85B market cap).
- •TRN trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.14 vs 21.91 P/E).
- •EPAC converts more revenue to profit (13.69% vs 12.37% net margin).
- •EPAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.64% vs 3.77% CAGR).
- •TRN pays the higher dividend yield (3.51% vs 0.11%).
Which is better, EPAC or TRN?
Metric tally: EPAC 7 · TRN 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRN(lower P/E)
GrowthEPAC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTRN(higher dividend yield)
QualityEPAC(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | EPAC | TRN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.91 | 11.14● |
| Forward P/E | 18.50 | 14.95● |
| P/S ratio | 2.96 | 1.38● |
| P/B ratio | 4.54 | 2.64● |
| PEG ratio | 2.78 | 0.10● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.91 | 8.46● |
| FCF yield | 5.98% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | EPAC | TRN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.58%● | 27.01% |
| Operating margin | 20.52%● | 16.59% |
| Net margin | 13.69%● | 12.37% |
| ROE | 21.00% | 23.66%● |
| ROIC | 15.12%● | 3.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | EPAC | TRN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.11% | 3.51%● |
| Payout ratio | 2.33% | 38.98% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EPAC | TRN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.64%● | 3.77% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 169.53%● | 19.40% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 31.53%● | -8.79% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.02% | 7.19%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, EPAC or TRN?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRN (lower P/E); growth: EPAC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TRN (higher dividend yield); quality: EPAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRN leads 9 to 7.
- Is EPAC or TRN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRN is cheaper: EPAC trades at a 21.91 P/E and TRN at 11.14.
- Which has grown faster, EPAC or TRN?
- Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 6.64% CAGR versus TRN at 3.77%.
- Does EPAC or TRN pay a bigger dividend?
- EPAC yields 0.11% and TRN yields 3.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EPAC or TRN more profitable?
- EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 13.69% versus TRN at 12.37%.
- Which has been the better investment, EPAC or TRN?
- Over the past 10-year, TRN delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.09% versus TRN at 13.80%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Enerpac Tool P/E ratioTrinity Industries P/E ratioEnerpac Tool dividend yieldTrinity Industries dividend yieldEnerpac Tool ROETrinity Industries ROEEnerpac Tool operating marginTrinity Industries operating marginEnerpac Tool revenue growthTrinity Industries revenue growthEnerpac Tool free cash flowTrinity Industries free cash flow
Enerpac Tool & Trinity Industries appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.