Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAC or TRN?

TRN has the lower trailing P/E: EPAC trades at 19.71 and TRN at 11.89. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EPAC or TRN?

Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 5.10% CAGR versus TRN at 3.77%.

Does EPAC or TRN pay a bigger dividend?

EPAC yields 0.11% and TRN yields 3.29% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is EPAC or TRN more profitable?

EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 14.72% versus TRN at 12.37%.

How have EPAC and TRN total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, EPAC delivered 3.89% and TRN delivered 12.93% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN)

A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and Trinity Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EPAC

Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

$1.91B

$37.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TRN

Trinity Industries, Inc.

$3.03B

$38.07IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — EPAC vs TRN

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

EPAC +2967.5%TRN +830.9%EPAC compounded faster

EPAC TRN

EPAC vs TRN: by the numbers

•TRN is the larger company ($3.03B vs $1.91B market cap).
•TRN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.89 vs 19.71 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•EPAC converts more revenue to profit (14.72% vs 12.37% net margin).
•EPAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.10% vs 3.77% CAGR).
•TRN pays the higher dividend yield (3.29% vs 0.11%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EPAC	TRN
P/E ratio	19.71	11.89
Forward P/E	18.70	16.31
P/S ratio	2.84	1.47
P/B ratio	4.24	2.82
PEG ratio	2.78	0.10
EV / EBITDA	11.97	12.65
FCF yield	6.24%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	EPAC	TRN
Gross margin	49.05%	27.01%
Operating margin	21.76%	16.59%
Net margin	14.72%	12.37%
ROE	22.01%	23.66%
ROIC	15.12%	3.46%

Dividends

Metric	EPAC	TRN
Dividend yield	0.11%	3.29%
Payout ratio	2.33%	38.98%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EPAC	TRN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.10%	3.77%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	169.53%	19.40%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	34.85%	-8.79%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.62%	11.19%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAC or TRN?: TRN has the lower trailing P/E: EPAC trades at 19.71 and TRN at 11.89. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EPAC or TRN?: Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 5.10% CAGR versus TRN at 3.77%.
Does EPAC or TRN pay a bigger dividend?: EPAC yields 0.11% and TRN yields 3.29% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is EPAC or TRN more profitable?: EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 14.72% versus TRN at 12.37%.
How have EPAC and TRN total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, EPAC delivered 3.89% and TRN delivered 12.93% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EPAC analysis Full TRN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Enerpac Tool P/E ratio Trinity Industries P/E ratio Enerpac Tool dividend yield Trinity Industries dividend yield Enerpac Tool ROE Trinity Industries ROE Enerpac Tool operating margin Trinity Industries operating margin Enerpac Tool revenue growth Trinity Industries revenue growth Enerpac Tool free cash flow Trinity Industries free cash flow

Enerpac Tool & Trinity Industries appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.