Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs Rambus Inc. (RMBS)
A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and Rambus Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: EPAC is classified in Industrials; RMBS is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$37.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
RMBS
Rambus Inc.
$87.75TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — EPAC vs RMBS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 29yEPAC +1751.9%RMBS +1175.0%EPAC compounded faster
EPAC RMBS
EPAC vs RMBS: by the numbers
- •RMBS is the larger company ($9.49B vs $1.91B market cap).
- •EPAC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.71 vs 44.23 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •RMBS converts more revenue to profit (31.69% vs 14.72% net margin).
- •RMBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.51% vs 5.10% CAGR).
- •EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while RMBS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EPAC | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.71 | 44.23 |
| Forward P/E | 18.70 | 32.09 |
| P/S ratio | 2.84 | 14.00 |
| P/B ratio | 4.24 | 7.22 |
| PEG ratio | 2.78 | 1.53 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.97 | 36.02 |
| FCF yield | 6.24% | 3.17% |
Profitability
| Metric | EPAC | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.05% | 78.27% |
| Operating margin | 21.76% | 35.51% |
| Net margin | 14.72% | 31.69% |
| ROE | 22.01% | 16.34% |
| ROIC | 15.12% | 15.03% |
Dividends
| Metric | EPAC | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.11% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 2.33% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EPAC | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.10% | 22.51% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 169.53% | 48.76% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 34.85% | 16.48% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.62% | 30.60% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAC or RMBS?
- EPAC has the lower trailing P/E: EPAC trades at 19.71 and RMBS at 44.23. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EPAC or RMBS?
- Over the past five years, RMBS grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 5.10% CAGR versus RMBS at 22.51%.
- Does EPAC or RMBS pay a bigger dividend?
- EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while RMBS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is EPAC or RMBS more profitable?
- RMBS runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 14.72% versus RMBS at 31.69%.
- How have EPAC and RMBS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, EPAC delivered 3.89% and RMBS delivered 20.49% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Enerpac Tool P/E ratioRambus P/E ratioEnerpac Tool dividend yieldRambus dividend yieldEnerpac Tool ROERambus ROEEnerpac Tool operating marginRambus operating marginEnerpac Tool revenue growthRambus revenue growthEnerpac Tool free cash flowRambus free cash flow
Enerpac Tool & Rambus appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.