Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: EPAC is classified in Industrials; QCOM is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$37.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$162.88TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — EPAC vs QCOM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yEPAC +2967.5%QCOM +11063.6%QCOM compounded faster
EPAC QCOM
EPAC vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •QCOM is the larger company ($171.68B vs $1.91B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.24 vs 19.71 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •QCOM converts more revenue to profit (22.31% vs 14.72% net margin).
- •QCOM grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.63% vs 5.10% CAGR).
- •QCOM pays the higher dividend yield (2.11% vs 0.11%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EPAC | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.71 | 18.24 |
| Forward P/E | 18.70 | 15.79 |
| P/S ratio | 2.84 | 4.10 |
| P/B ratio | 4.24 | 6.68 |
| PEG ratio | 2.78 | 3.18 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.97 | 14.61 |
| FCF yield | 6.24% | 6.86% |
Profitability
| Metric | EPAC | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.05% | 54.80% |
| Operating margin | 21.76% | 25.52% |
| Net margin | 14.72% | 22.31% |
| ROE | 22.01% | 36.38% |
| ROIC | 15.12% | 13.15% |
Dividends
| Metric | EPAC | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.11% | 2.11% |
| Payout ratio | 2.33% | 70.95% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EPAC | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.10% | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 169.53% | 5.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 34.85% | 9.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.62% | 6.10% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAC or QCOM?
- QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: EPAC trades at 19.71 and QCOM at 18.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EPAC or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, QCOM grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 5.10% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
- Does EPAC or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- EPAC yields 0.11% and QCOM yields 2.11% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EPAC or QCOM more profitable?
- QCOM runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 14.72% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
- How have EPAC and QCOM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, EPAC delivered 3.89% and QCOM delivered 13.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Enerpac Tool P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioEnerpac Tool dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldEnerpac Tool ROEQUALCOMM ROEEnerpac Tool operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginEnerpac Tool revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthEnerpac Tool free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Enerpac Tool & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.