Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs Kforce Inc. (KFRC)
EPAC leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and Kforce Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — EPAC vs KFRC
growth of $100 · last 30yEPAC +2477.2%KFRC +266.8%EPAC compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
EPAC KFRC
EPAC vs KFRC: by the numbers
- •EPAC is the larger company ($1.85B vs $892M market cap).
- •EPAC trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.91 vs 25.64 P/E).
- •EPAC converts more revenue to profit (13.69% vs 2.60% net margin).
- •EPAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.64% vs -1.39% CAGR).
- •KFRC pays the higher dividend yield (3.16% vs 0.11%).
Which is better, EPAC or KFRC?
Metric tally: EPAC 13 · KFRC 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueEPAC(lower P/E)
GrowthEPAC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKFRC(higher dividend yield)
QualityEPAC(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | EPAC | KFRC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.91● | 25.64 |
| Forward P/E | 18.50● | 20.77 |
| P/S ratio | 2.96 | 0.65● |
| P/B ratio | 4.54● | 7.33 |
| PEG ratio | 2.78 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.91● | 18.12 |
| FCF yield | 5.98%● | 5.04% |
Profitability
| Metric | EPAC | KFRC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.58%● | 27.22% |
| Operating margin | 20.52%● | 3.80% |
| Net margin | 13.69%● | 2.60% |
| ROE | 21.00% | 29.49%● |
| ROIC | 15.12%● | 14.55% |
Dividends
| Metric | EPAC | KFRC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.11% | 3.16%● |
| Payout ratio | 2.33% | 80.61% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EPAC | KFRC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.64%● | -1.39% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 169.53%● | -6.00% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 31.53%● | -18.81% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.02%● | -1.68% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, EPAC or KFRC?
- It depends on your goal. value: EPAC (lower P/E); growth: EPAC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KFRC (higher dividend yield); quality: EPAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EPAC leads 13 to 3.
- Is EPAC or KFRC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, EPAC is cheaper: EPAC trades at a 21.91 P/E and KFRC at 25.64.
- Which has grown faster, EPAC or KFRC?
- Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 6.64% CAGR versus KFRC at -1.39%.
- Does EPAC or KFRC pay a bigger dividend?
- EPAC yields 0.11% and KFRC yields 3.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EPAC or KFRC more profitable?
- EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 13.69% versus KFRC at 2.60%.
- Which has been the better investment, EPAC or KFRC?
- Over the past 10-year, KFRC delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.09% versus KFRC at 13.04%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Enerpac Tool P/E ratioKforce P/E ratioEnerpac Tool dividend yieldKforce dividend yieldEnerpac Tool ROEKforce ROEEnerpac Tool operating marginKforce operating marginEnerpac Tool revenue growthKforce revenue growthEnerpac Tool free cash flowKforce free cash flow
Enerpac Tool & Kforce appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.