Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs Griffon Corporation (GFF)
EPAC leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and Griffon Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — EPAC vs GFF
growth of $100 · last 30yEPAC +2580.3%GFF +1163.1%EPAC compounded faster
EPAC GFF
EPAC vs GFF: by the numbers
- •GFF is the larger company ($4.34B vs $1.87B market cap).
- •EPAC trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.11 vs 131.57 P/E).
- •EPAC converts more revenue to profit (13.69% vs 1.27% net margin).
- •EPAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.64% vs -0.52% CAGR).
- •GFF pays the higher dividend yield (0.89% vs 0.11%).
Which is better, EPAC or GFF?
Metric tally: EPAC 11 · GFF 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueEPAC(lower P/E)
GrowthEPAC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeGFF(higher dividend yield)
QualityEPAC(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EPAC | GFF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 22.11● | 131.57 |
| Forward P/E | 18.67 | — |
| P/S ratio | 2.99 | 1.84● |
| P/B ratio | 4.59● | 45.83 |
| PEG ratio | 2.78● | 7.63 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.04● | 22.28 |
| FCF yield | 5.92% | 6.64%● |
Profitability
| Metric | EPAC | GFF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.58%● | 42.62% |
| Operating margin | 20.52%● | 8.32% |
| Net margin | 13.69%● | 1.27% |
| ROE | 21.00% | 31.61%● |
| ROIC | 15.12%● | 4.68% |
Dividends
| Metric | EPAC | GFF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.11% | 0.89%● |
| Payout ratio | 2.33% | 74.34% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EPAC | GFF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.64%● | -0.52% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 169.53%● | 17.25% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 31.53%● | 19.27% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.15% | 32.40%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, EPAC or GFF?
- It depends on your goal. value: EPAC (lower P/E); growth: EPAC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GFF (higher dividend yield); quality: EPAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EPAC leads 11 to 5.
- Is EPAC or GFF cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, EPAC is cheaper: EPAC trades at a 22.11 P/E and GFF at 131.57.
- Which has grown faster, EPAC or GFF?
- Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 6.64% CAGR versus GFF at -0.52%.
- Does EPAC or GFF pay a bigger dividend?
- EPAC yields 0.11% and GFF yields 0.89% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EPAC or GFF more profitable?
- EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 13.69% versus GFF at 1.27%.
- Which has been the better investment, EPAC or GFF?
- Over the past 10-year, GFF delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.39% versus GFF at 21.67%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Enerpac Tool P/E ratioGriffon P/E ratioEnerpac Tool dividend yieldGriffon dividend yieldEnerpac Tool ROEGriffon ROEEnerpac Tool operating marginGriffon operating marginEnerpac Tool revenue growthGriffon revenue growthEnerpac Tool free cash flowGriffon free cash flow
Enerpac Tool & Griffon appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.