Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs Griffon Corporation (GFF)
A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and Griffon Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$36.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 11:39 AM EDT
GFF
Griffon Corporation
$86.87IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 11:40 AM EDT
Total return — EPAC vs GFF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yEPAC +3101.2%GFF +1423.8%EPAC compounded faster
EPAC GFF
EPAC vs GFF: by the numbers
- •GFF is the larger company ($3.98B vs $1.86B market cap).
- •EPAC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.56 vs 122.08 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EPAC converts more revenue to profit (14.72% vs 1.27% net margin).
- •EPAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.10% vs 4.05% CAGR).
- •GFF pays the higher dividend yield (0.96% vs 0.11%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EPAC | GFF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.56 | 122.08 |
| Forward P/E | 19.52 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 2.96 | 1.71 |
| P/B ratio | 4.43 | 42.52 |
| PEG ratio | 2.78 | 7.08 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.47 | 21.29 |
| FCF yield | 5.98% | 7.15% |
Profitability
| Metric | EPAC | GFF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.05% | 42.62% |
| Operating margin | 21.76% | 8.32% |
| Net margin | 14.72% | 1.27% |
| ROE | 22.01% | 31.61% |
| ROIC | 15.12% | 4.68% |
Dividends
| Metric | EPAC | GFF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.11% | 0.96% |
| Payout ratio | 2.33% | 74.34% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EPAC | GFF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.10% | 4.05% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 169.53% | 17.25% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 34.85% | 19.27% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.39% | 34.10% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAC or GFF?
- EPAC has the lower trailing P/E: EPAC trades at 20.56 and GFF at 122.08. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EPAC or GFF?
- Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 5.10% CAGR versus GFF at 4.05%.
- Does EPAC or GFF pay a bigger dividend?
- EPAC yields 0.11% and GFF yields 0.96% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EPAC or GFF more profitable?
- EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 14.72% versus GFF at 1.27%.
- How have EPAC and GFF total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, EPAC delivered 4.53% and GFF delivered 20.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Enerpac Tool P/E ratioGriffon P/E ratioEnerpac Tool dividend yieldGriffon dividend yieldEnerpac Tool ROEGriffon ROEEnerpac Tool operating marginGriffon operating marginEnerpac Tool revenue growthGriffon revenue growthEnerpac Tool free cash flowGriffon free cash flow
Enerpac Tool & Griffon appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 30, 2026.