Which has the lower trailing P/E, EOG or WMB?

EOG has the lower trailing P/E: EOG trades at 14.32 and WMB at 30.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EOG or WMB?

Over the past five years, EOG grew revenue faster — EOG at a 17.61% CAGR versus WMB at 7.21%.

Does EOG or WMB pay a bigger dividend?

EOG yields 2.77% and WMB yields 2.89% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is EOG or WMB more profitable?

WMB runs the higher net margin — EOG at 23.41% versus WMB at 23.82%.

How have EOG and WMB total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, EOG delivered 9.36% and WMB delivered 17.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) vs The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB)

A side-by-side comparison of EOG Resources, Inc. and The Williams Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EOG

EOG Resources, Inc.

$78.55B

$147.48EnergyDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 2:30 PM EDT

WMB

The Williams Companies, Inc.

$87.61B

$71.64EnergyDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 2:30 PM EDT

Total return — EOG vs WMB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

EOG +3334.3%WMB +4871.3%WMB compounded faster

EOG WMB

EOG vs WMB: by the numbers

•WMB is the larger company ($87.61B vs $78.55B market cap).
•EOG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.32 vs 30.97 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•WMB converts more revenue to profit (23.82% vs 23.41% net margin).
•EOG grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs 7.21% CAGR).
•WMB pays the higher dividend yield (2.89% vs 2.77%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EOG	WMB
P/E ratio	14.32	30.97
Forward P/E	8.80	29.99
P/S ratio	3.32	7.27
P/B ratio	2.52	6.68
PEG ratio	1.23	1.60
EV / EBITDA	6.06	17.17
FCF yield	5.24%	0.83%

Profitability

Metric	EOG	WMB
Gross margin	71.29%	42.86%
Operating margin	36.92%	38.79%
Net margin	23.41%	23.82%
ROE	17.79%	21.85%
ROIC	58.12%	6.16%

Dividends

Metric	EOG	WMB
Dividend yield	2.77%	2.89%
Payout ratio	44.05%	95.79%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EOG	WMB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.61%	7.21%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.64%	65.97%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	20.58%	-21.34%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	20.25%	28.96%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EOG or WMB?: EOG has the lower trailing P/E: EOG trades at 14.32 and WMB at 30.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EOG or WMB?: Over the past five years, EOG grew revenue faster — EOG at a 17.61% CAGR versus WMB at 7.21%.
Does EOG or WMB pay a bigger dividend?: EOG yields 2.77% and WMB yields 2.89% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is EOG or WMB more profitable?: WMB runs the higher net margin — EOG at 23.41% versus WMB at 23.82%.
How have EOG and WMB total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, EOG delivered 9.36% and WMB delivered 17.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EOG analysis Full WMB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

EOG Resources P/E ratio Williams Companies P/E ratio EOG Resources dividend yield Williams Companies dividend yield EOG Resources ROE Williams Companies ROE EOG Resources operating margin Williams Companies operating margin EOG Resources revenue growth Williams Companies revenue growth EOG Resources free cash flow Williams Companies free cash flow

EOG Resources & Williams Companies appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 30, 2026.