Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA) vs Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO)

A side-by-side comparison of Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — ENTA vs OBIO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
ENTA -73.6% (-19.9%/yr)OBIO -47.1% (-10.1%/yr)OBIO compounded faster over this window
050100150200Start $100202120222023202420252026$26$53
ENTA OBIO

ENTA vs OBIO: by the numbers

  • •ENTA is the larger company ($357M vs $352M market cap).
  • •Both run net losses; ENTA's is the smaller (-96.89% vs -184.60% net margin).
  • •OBIO grew revenue faster over the past five years (148.45% vs -7.65% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricENTAOBIO
P/S ratio5.4711.01
P/B ratio3.5318.22

Profitability

MetricENTAOBIO
Gross margin98.15%99.32%
Operating margin-130.65%-154.73%
Net margin-96.89%-184.60%
ROE-62.56%-200.64%
ROIC-24.20%-56.73%

Growth (annualized)

MetricENTAOBIO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)-7.65%148.45%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-26.94%-9.35%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, ENTA or OBIO?
Over the past five years, OBIO grew revenue faster — ENTA at a -7.65% CAGR versus OBIO at 148.45%.
How have ENTA and OBIO total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, ENTA delivered -26.94% and OBIO delivered -9.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.