Which has the lower trailing P/E, ENSG or UHS?

UHS has the lower trailing P/E: ENSG trades at 27.20 and UHS at 7.08. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ENSG or UHS?

Over the past five years, ENSG grew revenue faster — ENSG at a 17.08% CAGR versus UHS at 8.21%.

Does ENSG or UHS pay a bigger dividend?

ENSG yields 0.15% and UHS yields 0.46% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ENSG or UHS more profitable?

UHS runs the higher net margin — ENSG at 6.90% versus UHS at 8.42%.

How have ENSG and UHS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ENSG delivered 26.44% and UHS delivered 4.20% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)

A side-by-side comparison of The Ensign Group, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ENSG

The Ensign Group, Inc.

$10.11B

$173.54HealthcareDelayed quote: Aug 27, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

UHS

Universal Health Services, Inc.

$10.45B

$172.58HealthcareDelayed quote: Aug 27, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ENSG vs UHS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ENSG +934.1% (+26.3%/yr)UHS +49.7% (+4.1%/yr)ENSG compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ENSG UHS

ENSG vs UHS: by the numbers

•UHS is the larger company ($10.45B vs $10.11B market cap).
•UHS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (7.08 vs 27.20 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•UHS converts more revenue to profit (8.42% vs 6.90% net margin).
•ENSG grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.08% vs 8.21% CAGR).
•UHS pays the higher dividend yield (0.46% vs 0.15%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ENSG	UHS
P/E ratio	27.20	7.08
Forward P/E	22.26	7.65
P/S ratio	1.88	0.57
P/B ratio	4.23	1.38
EV / EBITDA	21.15	5.73
FCF yield	4.06%	7.99%

Profitability

Metric	ENSG	UHS
Gross margin	14.14%	90.69%
Operating margin	8.52%	11.36%
Net margin	6.90%	8.42%
ROE	15.51%	20.31%
ROIC	7.29%	11.74%

Dividends

Metric	ENSG	UHS
Dividend yield	0.15%	0.46%
Payout ratio	4.29%	3.42%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ENSG	UHS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.08%	8.21%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	13.47%	16.19%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.84%	-12.18%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	16.34%	2.47%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ENSG or UHS?: UHS has the lower trailing P/E: ENSG trades at 27.20 and UHS at 7.08. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ENSG or UHS?: Over the past five years, ENSG grew revenue faster — ENSG at a 17.08% CAGR versus UHS at 8.21%.
Does ENSG or UHS pay a bigger dividend?: ENSG yields 0.15% and UHS yields 0.46% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ENSG or UHS more profitable?: UHS runs the higher net margin — ENSG at 6.90% versus UHS at 8.42%.
How have ENSG and UHS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ENSG delivered 26.44% and UHS delivered 4.20% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ENSG analysis Full UHS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ensign P/E ratio Universal Health Services P/E ratio Ensign dividend yield Universal Health Services dividend yield Ensign ROE Universal Health Services ROE Ensign operating margin Universal Health Services operating margin Ensign revenue growth Universal Health Services revenue growth Ensign free cash flow Universal Health Services free cash flow

Ensign & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 28, 2026.