Which has the lower trailing P/E, ENS or MSM?

ENS has the lower trailing P/E: ENS trades at 20.66 and MSM at 29.47. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ENS or MSM?

Over the past five years, MSM grew revenue faster — ENS at a 4.20% CAGR versus MSM at 4.34%.

Does ENS or MSM pay a bigger dividend?

ENS yields 0.54% and MSM yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ENS or MSM more profitable?

ENS runs the higher net margin — ENS at 9.29% versus MSM at 5.90%.

How have ENS and MSM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ENS delivered 11.72% and MSM delivered 10.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

EnerSys (ENS) vs MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (MSM)

A side-by-side comparison of EnerSys and MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 27, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ENS

EnerSys

$6.96B

$190.98IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 27, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MSM

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.

$6.81B

$122.01IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 27, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ENS vs MSM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ENS +204.0% (+11.8%/yr)MSM +153.4% (+9.7%/yr)ENS compounded faster over this window

ENS MSM

ENS vs MSM: by the numbers

•ENS is the larger company ($6.96B vs $6.81B market cap).
•ENS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.66 vs 29.47 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ENS converts more revenue to profit (9.29% vs 5.90% net margin).
•MSM grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.34% vs 4.20% CAGR).
•MSM pays the higher dividend yield (2.85% vs 0.54%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ENS	MSM
P/E ratio	20.66	29.47
Forward P/E	18.65	26.45
P/S ratio	1.91	1.75
P/B ratio	3.69	4.81
EV / EBITDA	12.38	16.49
FCF yield	9.88%	3.22%

Profitability

Metric	ENS	MSM
Gross margin	30.51%	40.82%
Operating margin	13.45%	8.80%
Net margin	9.29%	5.90%
ROE	17.89%	16.24%
ROIC	13.39%	12.36%

Dividends

Metric	ENS	MSM
Dividend yield	0.54%	2.85%
Payout ratio	13.39%	97.48%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ENS	MSM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.20%	4.34%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	18.40%	-4.65%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	39.95%	5.48%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.82%	11.51%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ENS or MSM?: ENS has the lower trailing P/E: ENS trades at 20.66 and MSM at 29.47. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ENS or MSM?: Over the past five years, MSM grew revenue faster — ENS at a 4.20% CAGR versus MSM at 4.34%.
Does ENS or MSM pay a bigger dividend?: ENS yields 0.54% and MSM yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ENS or MSM more profitable?: ENS runs the higher net margin — ENS at 9.29% versus MSM at 5.90%.
How have ENS and MSM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ENS delivered 11.72% and MSM delivered 10.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ENS analysis Full MSM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

EnerSys P/E ratio MSC Industrial Direct P/E ratio EnerSys dividend yield MSC Industrial Direct dividend yield EnerSys ROE MSC Industrial Direct ROE EnerSys operating margin MSC Industrial Direct operating margin EnerSys revenue growth MSC Industrial Direct revenue growth EnerSys free cash flow MSC Industrial Direct free cash flow

EnerSys & MSC Industrial Direct appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 27, 2026.