Is ENS or FLR cheaper?

On trailing earnings, FLR is cheaper: ENS trades at a 28.40 P/E and FLR at 27.22.

Which has grown faster, ENS or FLR?

Over the past five years, ENS grew revenue faster — ENS at a 4.73% CAGR versus FLR at 1.92%.

Does ENS or FLR pay a bigger dividend?

ENS pays a dividend (0.48% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.

Is ENS or FLR more profitable?

ENS runs the higher net margin — ENS at 7.82% versus FLR at 2.30%.

Which has been the better investment, ENS or FLR?

Over the past 10-year, ENS delivered the higher annualized total return — ENS at 15.50% versus FLR at 1.81%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

EnerSys (ENS) vs Fluor Corporation (FLR)

ENS leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics, though FLR is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of EnerSys and Fluor Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — ENS vs FLR

growth of $100 · last 22y

ENS +1719.1%FLR +135.4%ENS compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ENS FLR

ENS vs FLR: by the numbers

•ENS is the larger company ($8.29B vs $7.49B market cap).
•FLR trades at the lower earnings multiple (27.22 vs 28.40 P/E).
•ENS converts more revenue to profit (7.82% vs 2.30% net margin).
•ENS grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.73% vs 1.92% CAGR).
•ENS pays a dividend (0.48% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.

Which is better, ENS or FLR?

Metric tally: ENS 8 · FLR 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueFLR(lower P/E)

GrowthENS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityENS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ENS	FLR
P/E ratio	28.40	27.22●
Forward P/E	21.17	20.67●
P/S ratio	2.23	0.62●
P/B ratio	4.38	3.29●
PEG ratio	0.26●	1.25
EV / EBITDA	17.80	—
FCF yield	5.60%	—

Profitability

Metric	ENS	FLR
Gross margin	29.26%●	-1.63%
Operating margin	11.87%●	-3.40%
Net margin	7.82%●	2.30%
ROE	15.40%●	12.19%
ROIC	12.37%●	1.84%

Dividends

Metric	ENS	FLR
Dividend yield	0.48%	—
Payout ratio	13.39%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ENS	FLR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.73%●	1.92%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	18.40%	40.81%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.15%●	6.28%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	19.48%	23.65%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, ENS or FLR?: It depends on your goal. value: FLR (lower P/E); growth: ENS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ENS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ENS leads 8 to 6.
Is ENS or FLR cheaper?: On trailing earnings, FLR is cheaper: ENS trades at a 28.40 P/E and FLR at 27.22.
Which has grown faster, ENS or FLR?: Over the past five years, ENS grew revenue faster — ENS at a 4.73% CAGR versus FLR at 1.92%.
Does ENS or FLR pay a bigger dividend?: ENS pays a dividend (0.48% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.
Is ENS or FLR more profitable?: ENS runs the higher net margin — ENS at 7.82% versus FLR at 2.30%.
Which has been the better investment, ENS or FLR?: Over the past 10-year, ENS delivered the higher annualized total return — ENS at 15.50% versus FLR at 1.81%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ENS analysis Full FLR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

EnerSys P/E ratio Fluor P/E ratio EnerSys dividend yield Fluor dividend yield EnerSys ROE Fluor ROE EnerSys operating margin Fluor operating margin EnerSys revenue growth Fluor revenue growth EnerSys free cash flow Fluor free cash flow

EnerSys & Fluor appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.