Which has the lower trailing P/E, EMR or WM?

WM has the lower trailing P/E: EMR trades at 34.60 and WM at 29.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EMR or WM?

Over the past five years, WM grew revenue faster — EMR at a 0.87% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.

Does EMR or WM pay a bigger dividend?

EMR yields 1.46% and WM yields 1.64% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is EMR or WM more profitable?

EMR runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.83% versus WM at 11.12%.

How have EMR and WM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, EMR delivered 14.33% and WM delivered 15.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)

A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EMR

Emerson Electric Co.

$88.55B

$158.10IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Waste Management, Inc.

$82.67B

$206.83IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — EMR vs WM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

EMR +267.6% (+13.9%/yr)WM +308.8% (+15.1%/yr)WM compounded faster over this window

EMR WM

EMR vs WM: by the numbers

•EMR is the larger company ($88.55B vs $82.67B market cap).
•WM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (29.30 vs 34.60 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•EMR converts more revenue to profit (13.83% vs 11.12% net margin).
•WM grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.22% vs 0.87% CAGR).
•WM pays the higher dividend yield (1.64% vs 1.46%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EMR	WM
P/E ratio	34.60	29.30
Forward P/E	24.10	25.50
P/S ratio	4.75	3.22
P/B ratio	4.35	8.33
EV / EBITDA	19.80	13.58
FCF yield	3.91%	4.32%

Profitability

Metric	EMR	WM
Gross margin	53.16%	35.04%
Operating margin	20.11%	18.54%
Net margin	13.83%	11.12%
ROE	12.65%	28.74%
ROIC	7.93%	9.01%

Dividends

Metric	EMR	WM
Dividend yield	1.46%	1.64%
Payout ratio	48.58%	50.14%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EMR	WM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.87%	9.22%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	4.54%	13.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	0.41%	7.05%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.92%	8.67%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EMR or WM?: WM has the lower trailing P/E: EMR trades at 34.60 and WM at 29.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EMR or WM?: Over the past five years, WM grew revenue faster — EMR at a 0.87% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.
Does EMR or WM pay a bigger dividend?: EMR yields 1.46% and WM yields 1.64% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is EMR or WM more profitable?: EMR runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.83% versus WM at 11.12%.
How have EMR and WM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, EMR delivered 14.33% and WM delivered 15.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EMR analysis Full WM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Emerson Electric P/E ratio Waste Management P/E ratio Emerson Electric dividend yield Waste Management dividend yield Emerson Electric ROE Waste Management ROE Emerson Electric operating margin Waste Management operating margin Emerson Electric revenue growth Waste Management revenue growth Emerson Electric free cash flow Waste Management free cash flow

Emerson Electric & Waste Management appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.