Is EMR or WM cheaper?

On trailing earnings, WM is cheaper: EMR trades at a 33.14 P/E and WM at 32.64.

Which has grown faster, EMR or WM?

Over the past five years, WM grew revenue faster — EMR at a 1.43% CAGR versus WM at 10.25%.

Does EMR or WM pay a bigger dividend?

EMR yields 1.55% and WM yields 1.68% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is EMR or WM more profitable?

EMR runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.35% versus WM at 10.99%.

Which has been the better investment, EMR or WM?

Over the past 10-year, WM delivered the higher annualized total return — EMR at 13.73% versus WM at 15.53%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)

WM leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Waste Management, Inc.

$90.57B

$225.53Industrials

Total return — EMR vs WM

growth of $100 · last 30y

EMR +532.4%WM +664.5%WM compounded faster

EMR WM

EMR vs WM: by the numbers

•WM is the larger company ($90.57B vs $80.37B market cap).
•WM trades at the lower earnings multiple (32.64 vs 33.14 P/E).
•EMR converts more revenue to profit (13.35% vs 10.99% net margin).
•WM grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.25% vs 1.43% CAGR).
•WM pays the higher dividend yield (1.68% vs 1.55%).

Which is better, EMR or WM?

Metric tally: EMR 7 · WM 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthWM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeWM(higher dividend yield)

QualityWM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EMR	WM
P/E ratio	33.14	32.64
Forward P/E	19.95●	24.48
P/S ratio	4.41	3.59●
P/B ratio	3.98●	9.10
PEG ratio	1.78●	2.39
EV / EBITDA	18.12	14.85●
FCF yield	3.86%●	3.61%

Profitability

Metric	EMR	WM
Gross margin	52.66%●	32.06%
Operating margin	19.96%●	18.46%
Net margin	13.35%●	10.99%
ROE	12.04%	27.88%●
ROIC	7.26%	8.88%●

Dividends

Metric	EMR	WM
Dividend yield	1.55%	1.68%●
Payout ratio	54.55%	56.25%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EMR	WM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	1.43%	10.25%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	4.54%	13.68%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-0.23%	7.28%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.57%	11.87%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, EMR or WM?: It depends on your goal. growth: WM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WM (higher dividend yield); quality: WM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WM leads 9 to 7.
Is EMR or WM cheaper?: On trailing earnings, WM is cheaper: EMR trades at a 33.14 P/E and WM at 32.64.
Which has grown faster, EMR or WM?: Over the past five years, WM grew revenue faster — EMR at a 1.43% CAGR versus WM at 10.25%.
Does EMR or WM pay a bigger dividend?: EMR yields 1.55% and WM yields 1.68% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is EMR or WM more profitable?: EMR runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.35% versus WM at 10.99%.
Which has been the better investment, EMR or WM?: Over the past 10-year, WM delivered the higher annualized total return — EMR at 13.73% versus WM at 15.53%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EMR analysis Full WM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Emerson Electric P/E ratio Waste Management P/E ratio Emerson Electric dividend yield Waste Management dividend yield Emerson Electric ROE Waste Management ROE Emerson Electric operating margin Waste Management operating margin Emerson Electric revenue growth Waste Management revenue growth Emerson Electric free cash flow Waste Management free cash flow

Emerson Electric & Waste Management appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.