Which has the lower trailing P/E, EMR or VRT?

EMR has the lower trailing P/E: EMR trades at 33.66 and VRT at 50.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EMR or VRT?

Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — EMR at a 1.43% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.

Does EMR or VRT pay a bigger dividend?

EMR yields 1.50% and VRT yields 0.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is EMR or VRT more profitable?

VRT runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.35% versus VRT at 15.09%.

How have EMR and VRT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, EMR delivered 12.84% and VRT delivered 51.45% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EMR

Emerson Electric Co.

$83.25B

$148.64IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 30, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

VRT

Vertiv Holdings Co

$87.38B

$227.50IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 30, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — EMR vs VRT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

EMR +146.3%VRT +2176.2%VRT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

EMR VRT

EMR vs VRT: by the numbers

•VRT is the larger company ($87.38B vs $83.25B market cap).
•EMR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.66 vs 50.46 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•VRT converts more revenue to profit (15.09% vs 13.35% net margin).
•VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.93% vs 1.43% CAGR).
•EMR pays the higher dividend yield (1.50% vs 0.10%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EMR	VRT
P/E ratio	33.66	50.46
Forward P/E	22.40	34.38
P/S ratio	4.48	7.63
P/B ratio	4.04	18.41
PEG ratio	1.78	0.28
EV / EBITDA	18.37	33.50
FCF yield	3.80%	2.50%

Profitability

Metric	EMR	VRT
Gross margin	52.66%	37.52%
Operating margin	19.96%	19.12%
Net margin	13.35%	15.09%
ROE	12.04%	36.40%
ROIC	7.26%	18.55%

Dividends

Metric	EMR	VRT
Dividend yield	1.50%	0.10%
Payout ratio	53.87%	6.45%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EMR	VRT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	1.43%	18.93%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	4.54%	79.41%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	0.94%	41.86%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.02%	51.45%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EMR or VRT?: EMR has the lower trailing P/E: EMR trades at 33.66 and VRT at 50.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EMR or VRT?: Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — EMR at a 1.43% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.
Does EMR or VRT pay a bigger dividend?: EMR yields 1.50% and VRT yields 0.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is EMR or VRT more profitable?: VRT runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.35% versus VRT at 15.09%.
How have EMR and VRT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, EMR delivered 12.84% and VRT delivered 51.45% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EMR analysis Full VRT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Emerson Electric P/E ratio Vertiv P/E ratio Emerson Electric dividend yield Vertiv dividend yield Emerson Electric ROE Vertiv ROE Emerson Electric operating margin Vertiv operating margin Emerson Electric revenue growth Vertiv revenue growth Emerson Electric free cash flow Vertiv free cash flow

Emerson Electric & Vertiv appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 30, 2026.