Which has the lower trailing P/E, EMR or TT?

EMR has the lower trailing P/E: EMR trades at 34.63 and TT at 36.57. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EMR or TT?

Over the past five years, TT grew revenue faster — EMR at a 0.87% CAGR versus TT at 10.44%.

Does EMR or TT pay a bigger dividend?

EMR yields 1.39% and TT yields 0.83% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is EMR or TT more profitable?

EMR runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.83% versus TT at 13.28%.

How have EMR and TT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, EMR delivered 14.20% and TT delivered 26.67% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs Trane Technologies plc (TT)

A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and Trane Technologies plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EMR

Emerson Electric Co.

$88.79B

$158.53IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 10, 2026, 11:10 AM EDT

Trane Technologies plc

$105.65B

$480.19IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 10, 2026, 11:10 AM EDT

Total return — EMR vs TT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

EMR +277.5% (+14.2%/yr)TT +970.3% (+26.8%/yr)TT compounded faster over this window

EMR TT

EMR vs TT: by the numbers

•TT is the larger company ($105.65B vs $88.79B market cap).
•EMR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (34.63 vs 36.57 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•EMR converts more revenue to profit (13.83% vs 13.28% net margin).
•TT grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.44% vs 0.87% CAGR).
•EMR pays the higher dividend yield (1.39% vs 0.83%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EMR	TT
P/E ratio	34.63	36.57
Forward P/E	24.20	31.85
P/S ratio	4.76	4.84
P/B ratio	4.38	12.45
EV / EBITDA	19.97	25.35
FCF yield	3.90%	3.49%

Profitability

Metric	EMR	TT
Gross margin	53.16%	35.39%
Operating margin	20.11%	17.94%
Net margin	13.83%	13.28%
ROE	12.71%	34.11%
ROIC	7.26%	20.26%

Dividends

Metric	EMR	TT
Dividend yield	1.39%	0.83%
Payout ratio	53.87%	30.40%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EMR	TT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.87%	10.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	4.54%	29.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	0.41%	11.84%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.52%	21.12%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EMR or TT?: EMR has the lower trailing P/E: EMR trades at 34.63 and TT at 36.57. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EMR or TT?: Over the past five years, TT grew revenue faster — EMR at a 0.87% CAGR versus TT at 10.44%.
Does EMR or TT pay a bigger dividend?: EMR yields 1.39% and TT yields 0.83% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is EMR or TT more profitable?: EMR runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.83% versus TT at 13.28%.
How have EMR and TT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, EMR delivered 14.20% and TT delivered 26.67% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EMR analysis Full TT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Emerson Electric P/E ratio Trane Technologies P/E ratio Emerson Electric dividend yield Trane Technologies dividend yield Emerson Electric ROE Trane Technologies ROE Emerson Electric operating margin Trane Technologies operating margin Emerson Electric revenue growth Trane Technologies revenue growth Emerson Electric free cash flow Trane Technologies free cash flow

Emerson Electric & Trane Technologies appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 10, 2026.