Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: EMR is classified in Industrials; STZ is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
$151.81IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$132.02Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — EMR vs STZ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yEMR +1508.2%STZ +4736.5%STZ compounded faster
EMR STZ
EMR vs STZ: by the numbers
- •EMR is the larger company ($85.03B vs $22.55B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.38 vs 34.48 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (20.14% vs 13.35% net margin).
- •EMR grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.43% vs 0.86% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.15% vs 1.47%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EMR | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.48 | 12.38 |
| Forward P/E | 22.95 | 11.14 |
| P/S ratio | 4.59 | 2.47 |
| P/B ratio | 4.14 | 2.71 |
| PEG ratio | 1.78 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.76 | 9.87 |
| FCF yield | 3.71% | 8.20% |
Profitability
| Metric | EMR | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.66% | 52.62% |
| Operating margin | 19.96% | 32.14% |
| Net margin | 13.35% | 20.14% |
| ROE | 12.04% | 22.10% |
| ROIC | 7.26% | 10.48% |
Dividends
| Metric | EMR | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 3.15% |
| Payout ratio | 53.87% | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EMR | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.43% | 0.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.54% | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.94% | -1.73% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.23% | -8.34% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EMR or STZ?
- STZ has the lower trailing P/E: EMR trades at 34.48 and STZ at 12.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EMR or STZ?
- Over the past five years, EMR grew revenue faster — EMR at a 1.43% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.
- Does EMR or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- EMR yields 1.47% and STZ yields 3.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EMR or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.35% versus STZ at 20.14%.
- How have EMR and STZ total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, EMR delivered 13.28% and STZ delivered -0.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Emerson Electric P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioEmerson Electric dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldEmerson Electric ROEConstellation Brands ROEEmerson Electric operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginEmerson Electric revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthEmerson Electric free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Emerson Electric & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.