Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR)
EMR leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and Quanta Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — EMR vs PWR
growth of $100 · last 28yEMR +371.3%PWR +9263.3%PWR compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
EMR PWR
EMR vs PWR: by the numbers
- •PWR is the larger company ($105.38B vs $84.38B market cap).
- •EMR trades at the lower earnings multiple (34.79 vs 96.33 P/E).
- •EMR converts more revenue to profit (13.35% vs 3.72% net margin).
- •PWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.91% vs 1.43% CAGR).
- •EMR pays the higher dividend yield (1.46% vs 0.06%).
Which is better, EMR or PWR?
Metric tally: EMR 11 · PWR 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueEMR(lower P/E)
GrowthPWR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeEMR(higher dividend yield)
QualityEMR(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EMR | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.79● | 96.33 |
| Forward P/E | 20.97● | 42.86 |
| P/S ratio | 4.63 | 3.56● |
| P/B ratio | 4.18● | 11.81 |
| PEG ratio | 1.77● | 5.40 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.89● | 46.89 |
| FCF yield | 3.67%● | 1.57% |
Profitability
| Metric | EMR | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.66%● | 13.59% |
| Operating margin | 19.96%● | 5.76% |
| Net margin | 13.35%● | 3.72% |
| ROE | 12.04% | 12.33%● |
| ROIC | 7.26%● | 7.07% |
Dividends
| Metric | EMR | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.46%● | 0.06% |
| Payout ratio | 53.87% | 6.11% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EMR | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.43% | 21.91%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.54% | 16.88%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.23% | 17.91%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.55% | 52.49%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, EMR or PWR?
- It depends on your goal. value: EMR (lower P/E); growth: PWR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: EMR (higher dividend yield); quality: EMR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EMR leads 11 to 6.
- Is EMR or PWR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, EMR is cheaper: EMR trades at a 34.79 P/E and PWR at 96.33.
- Which has grown faster, EMR or PWR?
- Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — EMR at a 1.43% CAGR versus PWR at 21.91%.
- Does EMR or PWR pay a bigger dividend?
- EMR yields 1.46% and PWR yields 0.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EMR or PWR more profitable?
- EMR runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.35% versus PWR at 3.72%.
- Which has been the better investment, EMR or PWR?
- Over the past 10-year, PWR delivered the higher annualized total return — EMR at 13.93% versus PWR at 40.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Emerson Electric P/E ratioQuanta Services P/E ratioEmerson Electric dividend yieldQuanta Services dividend yieldEmerson Electric ROEQuanta Services ROEEmerson Electric operating marginQuanta Services operating marginEmerson Electric revenue growthQuanta Services revenue growthEmerson Electric free cash flowQuanta Services free cash flow
Emerson Electric & Quanta Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.