Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC)
NSC leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and Norfolk Southern Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
$143.07Industrials
NSC
Norfolk Southern Corporation
$313.91Industrials
Total return — EMR vs NSC
growth of $100 · last 30yEMR +552.1%NSC +1011.2%NSC compounded faster
EMR NSC
EMR vs NSC: by the numbers
- •EMR is the larger company ($80.13B vs $70.50B market cap).
- •NSC trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.45 vs 33.04 P/E).
- •NSC converts more revenue to profit (21.91% vs 13.35% net margin).
- •NSC grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.45% vs 1.43% CAGR).
- •NSC pays the higher dividend yield (1.72% vs 1.53%).
Which is better, EMR or NSC?
Metric tally: EMR 6 · NSC 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNSC(lower P/E)
GrowthNSC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeNSC(higher dividend yield)
QualityNSC(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | EMR | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.04 | 26.45● |
| Forward P/E | 19.92● | 23.20 |
| P/S ratio | 4.40● | 5.80 |
| P/B ratio | 3.97● | 4.47 |
| PEG ratio | 1.77● | 2.24 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.92 | 15.65● |
| FCF yield | 3.87% | 5.41%● |
Profitability
| Metric | EMR | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.66%● | 45.31% |
| Operating margin | 19.96% | 32.39%● |
| Net margin | 13.35% | 21.91%● |
| ROE | 12.04% | 16.89%● |
| ROIC | 7.26% | 7.47%● |
Dividends
| Metric | EMR | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 1.72%● |
| Payout ratio | 53.87% | 42.35% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EMR | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.43% | 4.45%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.54% | 10.10%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.23% | 10.65%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.27%● | 5.11% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, EMR or NSC?
- It depends on your goal. value: NSC (lower P/E); growth: NSC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NSC (higher dividend yield); quality: NSC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NSC leads 11 to 6.
- Is EMR or NSC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NSC is cheaper: EMR trades at a 33.04 P/E and NSC at 26.45.
- Which has grown faster, EMR or NSC?
- Over the past five years, NSC grew revenue faster — EMR at a 1.43% CAGR versus NSC at 4.45%.
- Does EMR or NSC pay a bigger dividend?
- EMR yields 1.53% and NSC yields 1.72% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EMR or NSC more profitable?
- NSC runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.35% versus NSC at 21.91%.
- Which has been the better investment, EMR or NSC?
- Over the past 10-year, NSC delivered the higher annualized total return — EMR at 13.28% versus NSC at 16.41%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Emerson Electric P/E ratioNorfolk Southern P/E ratioEmerson Electric dividend yieldNorfolk Southern dividend yieldEmerson Electric ROENorfolk Southern ROEEmerson Electric operating marginNorfolk Southern operating marginEmerson Electric revenue growthNorfolk Southern revenue growthEmerson Electric free cash flowNorfolk Southern free cash flow
Emerson Electric & Norfolk Southern appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.