Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)

A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: EMR is classified in Industrials; MNST is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnEMR vs MNST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
EMR +267.7% (+13.9%/yr)MNST +255.7% (+13.5%/yr)EMR compounded faster over this window
100200300400Start $10020182020202220242026$368$356
EMR MNST

EMR vs MNST: by the numbers

  • MNST is the larger company ($86.46B vs $83.06B market cap).
  • EMR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (32.45 vs 40.74 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 13.83% net margin).
  • MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 0.87% CAGR).
  • EMR pays a dividend (1.46% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricEMRMNST
P/E ratio32.4540.74
Forward P/E22.6138.09
P/S ratio4.469.38
P/B ratio4.089.23
EV / EBITDA18.7229.15
FCF yield4.17%2.43%

Profitability

MetricEMRMNST
Gross margin53.16%55.55%
Operating margin20.11%29.16%
Net margin13.83%23.08%
ROE12.65%22.72%
ROIC7.93%21.32%

Dividends

MetricEMRMNST
Dividend yield1.46%N/A
Payout ratio48.58%N/A

Growth (annualized)

MetricEMRMNST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)0.87%12.36%
EPS CAGR (5Y)4.54%7.95%
FCF CAGR (5Y)0.41%7.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)10.92%12.59%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EMR or MNST?
EMR has the lower trailing P/E: EMR trades at 32.45 and MNST at 40.74. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EMR or MNST?
Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — EMR at a 0.87% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.
Does EMR or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
EMR pays a dividend (1.46% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is EMR or MNST more profitable?
MNST runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.83% versus MNST at 23.08%.
How have EMR and MNST total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, EMR delivered 14.33% and MNST delivered 13.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.