Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: EMR is classified in Industrials; MNST is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
$151.81IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$97.74Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — EMR vs MNST
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yEMR +1471.6%MNST +457491.3%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
EMR MNST
EMR vs MNST: by the numbers
- •MNST is the larger company ($95.59B vs $85.03B market cap).
- •EMR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (34.48 vs 46.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 13.35% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 1.43% CAGR).
- •EMR pays a dividend (1.47% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EMR | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.48 | 46.05 |
| Forward P/E | 22.95 | 41.41 |
| P/S ratio | 4.59 | 10.71 |
| P/B ratio | 4.14 | 10.80 |
| PEG ratio | 1.78 | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.76 | 34.17 |
| FCF yield | 3.71% | 2.20% |
Profitability
| Metric | EMR | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.66% | 55.47% |
| Operating margin | 19.96% | 29.34% |
| Net margin | 13.35% | 23.11% |
| ROE | 12.04% | 23.28% |
| ROIC | 7.26% | 21.74% |
Dividends
| Metric | EMR | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 53.87% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EMR | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.43% | 12.96% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.54% | 7.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.94% | 10.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.23% | 14.91% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EMR or MNST?
- EMR has the lower trailing P/E: EMR trades at 34.48 and MNST at 46.05. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EMR or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — EMR at a 1.43% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does EMR or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- EMR pays a dividend (1.47% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is EMR or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.35% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- How have EMR and MNST total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, EMR delivered 13.28% and MNST delivered 13.77% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Emerson Electric P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioEmerson Electric dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldEmerson Electric ROEMonster Beverage ROEEmerson Electric operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginEmerson Electric revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthEmerson Electric free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Emerson Electric & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.