Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: EMR is classified in Industrials; MNST is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
$148.30IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$44.20Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — EMR vs MNST
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yEMR +267.7% (+13.9%/yr)MNST +255.7% (+13.5%/yr)EMR compounded faster over this window
EMR MNST
EMR vs MNST: by the numbers
- •MNST is the larger company ($86.46B vs $83.06B market cap).
- •EMR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (32.45 vs 40.74 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 13.83% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 0.87% CAGR).
- •EMR pays a dividend (1.46% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EMR | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.45 | 40.74 |
| Forward P/E | 22.61 | 38.09 |
| P/S ratio | 4.46 | 9.38 |
| P/B ratio | 4.08 | 9.23 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.72 | 29.15 |
| FCF yield | 4.17% | 2.43% |
Profitability
| Metric | EMR | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 53.16% | 55.55% |
| Operating margin | 20.11% | 29.16% |
| Net margin | 13.83% | 23.08% |
| ROE | 12.65% | 22.72% |
| ROIC | 7.93% | 21.32% |
Dividends
| Metric | EMR | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 48.58% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EMR | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.87% | 12.36% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.54% | 7.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.41% | 7.93% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.92% | 12.59% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EMR or MNST?
- EMR has the lower trailing P/E: EMR trades at 32.45 and MNST at 40.74. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EMR or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — EMR at a 0.87% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.
- Does EMR or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- EMR pays a dividend (1.46% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is EMR or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.83% versus MNST at 23.08%.
- How have EMR and MNST total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, EMR delivered 14.33% and MNST delivered 13.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Emerson Electric P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioEmerson Electric dividend yieldEmerson Electric ROEMonster Beverage ROEEmerson Electric operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginEmerson Electric revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthEmerson Electric free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Emerson Electric & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.