The Eastern Company (EML) vs Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK)
A side-by-side comparison of The Eastern Company and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
EML
The Eastern Company
$24.92IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:18 PM EDT
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
$2.88IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:15 PM EDT
Total return — EML vs TUSK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yEML +53.0% (+4.3%/yr)TUSK -78.1% (-14.1%/yr)EML compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
EML TUSK
EML vs TUSK: by the numbers
- •EML is the larger company ($150M vs $139M market cap).
- •EML trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.67 vs 194.59 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EML converts more revenue to profit (3.43% vs 1.23% net margin).
- •EML grew revenue faster over the past five years (0.25% vs -25.88% CAGR).
- •EML pays a dividend (1.77% yield), while TUSK is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EML | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.67 | 194.59 |
| Forward P/E | 9.74 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 0.64 | 2.30 |
| P/B ratio | 1.16 | 0.53 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.40 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 10.07% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | EML | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 20.91% | -19.33% |
| Operating margin | 2.43% | -63.52% |
| Net margin | 3.43% | 1.23% |
| ROE | 6.18% | 0.28% |
| ROIC | 2.18% | -8.10% |
Dividends
| Metric | EML | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.77% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 32.95% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EML | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.25% | -25.88% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.70% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.21% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 1.65% | -2.17% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EML or TUSK?
- EML has the lower trailing P/E: EML trades at 18.67 and TUSK at 194.59. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EML or TUSK?
- Over the past five years, EML grew revenue faster — EML at a 0.25% CAGR versus TUSK at -25.88%.
- Does EML or TUSK pay a bigger dividend?
- EML pays a dividend (1.77% yield), while TUSK is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is EML or TUSK more profitable?
- EML runs the higher net margin — EML at 3.43% versus TUSK at 1.23%.
- How have EML and TUSK total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, EML delivered 1.65% and TUSK delivered -2.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Eastern P/E ratioMammoth Energy Services P/E ratioEastern dividend yieldEastern ROEMammoth Energy Services ROEEastern operating marginMammoth Energy Services operating marginEastern revenue growthMammoth Energy Services revenue growthEastern free cash flowMammoth Energy Services free cash flow
Eastern & Mammoth Energy Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.