The Eastern Company (EML) vs Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK)

A side-by-side comparison of The Eastern Company and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — EML vs TUSK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
EML +53.0% (+4.3%/yr)TUSK -78.1% (-14.1%/yr)EML compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
1101001kStart $10020182020202220242026$153$22
EML TUSK

EML vs TUSK: by the numbers

  • •EML is the larger company ($150M vs $139M market cap).
  • •EML trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.67 vs 194.59 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • •EML converts more revenue to profit (3.43% vs 1.23% net margin).
  • •EML grew revenue faster over the past five years (0.25% vs -25.88% CAGR).
  • •EML pays a dividend (1.77% yield), while TUSK is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricEMLTUSK
P/E ratio18.67194.59
Forward P/E9.74N/A
P/S ratio0.642.30
P/B ratio1.160.53
EV / EBITDA16.40N/A
FCF yield10.07%N/A

Profitability

MetricEMLTUSK
Gross margin20.91%-19.33%
Operating margin2.43%-63.52%
Net margin3.43%1.23%
ROE6.18%0.28%
ROIC2.18%-8.10%

Dividends

MetricEMLTUSK
Dividend yield1.77%N/A
Payout ratio32.95%N/A

Growth (annualized)

MetricEMLTUSK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)0.25%-25.88%
EPS CAGR (5Y)-0.70%N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)0.21%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)1.65%-2.17%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EML or TUSK?
EML has the lower trailing P/E: EML trades at 18.67 and TUSK at 194.59. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EML or TUSK?
Over the past five years, EML grew revenue faster — EML at a 0.25% CAGR versus TUSK at -25.88%.
Does EML or TUSK pay a bigger dividend?
EML pays a dividend (1.77% yield), while TUSK is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is EML or TUSK more profitable?
EML runs the higher net margin — EML at 3.43% versus TUSK at 1.23%.
How have EML and TUSK total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, EML delivered 1.65% and TUSK delivered -2.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.