Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp. Common Stock (EMAT) vs Ferroglobe PLC (GSM)

A side-by-side comparison of Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp. Common Stock and Ferroglobe PLC across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — EMAT vs GSM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1y
EMAT -81.3% (-81.3%/yr)GSM -4.1% (-4.1%/yr)GSM compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001kStart $1002026$19$96
EMAT GSM

EMAT vs GSM: by the numbers

  • •EMAT is the larger company ($1.17B vs $828M market cap).
  • •Both run net losses; GSM's is the smaller (-2.96% vs -12886.83% net margin).
  • •GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while EMAT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricEMATGSM
P/S ratio331.700.61
P/B ratioN/A1.15

Profitability

MetricEMATGSM
Gross margin0.00%6.70%
Operating margin0.00%-9.00%
Net margin-12886.83%-2.96%
ROEN/A-5.63%
ROIC-204.08%-11.22%

Dividends

MetricEMATGSM
Dividend yieldN/A1.35%

Growth (annualized)

MetricEMATGSM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A0.06%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A-12.07%

Frequently asked

Does EMAT or GSM pay a bigger dividend?
GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while EMAT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.