Which has grown faster, ELF or TAP?

Over the past five years, ELF grew revenue faster — ELF at a 38.12% CAGR versus TAP at 2.31%.

Does ELF or TAP pay a bigger dividend?

TAP pays a dividend (5.71% yield), while ELF has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is ELF or TAP more profitable?

ELF runs the higher net margin — ELF at 3.38% versus TAP at -20.81%.

How have ELF and TAP total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, ELF delivered 28.18% and TAP delivered -6.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) vs Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP)

A side-by-side comparison of e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. and Molson Coors Beverage Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ELF

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.

$6.17B

$104.76Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 2:35 PM EDT

TAP

Molson Coors Beverage Company

$7.78B

$41.46Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 2:35 PM EDT

Total return — ELF vs TAP

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ELF +300.6% (+14.9%/yr)TAP -47.7% (-6.3%/yr)ELF compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ELF TAP

ELF vs TAP: by the numbers

•TAP is the larger company ($7.78B vs $6.17B market cap).
•ELF is profitable (3.38% net margin) while TAP runs a net loss (-20.81%).
•ELF grew revenue faster over the past five years (38.12% vs 2.31% CAGR).
•TAP pays a dividend (5.71% yield), while ELF has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ELF	TAP
P/E ratio	106.14	N/A
Forward P/E	34.21	8.83
P/S ratio	3.60	0.71
P/B ratio	5.43	0.77
EV / EBITDA	24.95	N/A
FCF yield	4.42%	16.95%

Profitability

Metric	ELF	TAP
Gross margin	74.44%	36.22%
Operating margin	10.50%	-22.74%
Net margin	3.38%	-20.81%
ROE	5.10%	-22.79%
ROIC	6.12%	-11.90%

Dividends

Metric	ELF	TAP
Dividend yield	N/A	5.71%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ELF	TAP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	38.12%	2.31%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	28.19%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	74.16%	-0.97%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.18%	0.43%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, ELF or TAP?: Over the past five years, ELF grew revenue faster — ELF at a 38.12% CAGR versus TAP at 2.31%.
Does ELF or TAP pay a bigger dividend?: TAP pays a dividend (5.71% yield), while ELF has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is ELF or TAP more profitable?: ELF runs the higher net margin — ELF at 3.38% versus TAP at -20.81%.
How have ELF and TAP total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, ELF delivered 28.18% and TAP delivered -6.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ELF analysis Full TAP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

e.l.f. Beauty P/E ratio Molson Coors Beverage dividend yield e.l.f. Beauty ROE Molson Coors Beverage ROE e.l.f. Beauty operating margin Molson Coors Beverage operating margin e.l.f. Beauty revenue growth Molson Coors Beverage revenue growth e.l.f. Beauty free cash flow Molson Coors Beverage free cash flow

e.l.f. Beauty & Molson Coors Beverage appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 28, 2026.