Which has the lower trailing P/E, ELF or LW?

LW has the lower trailing P/E: ELF trades at 106.14 and LW at 26.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ELF or LW?

Over the past five years, ELF grew revenue faster — ELF at a 38.12% CAGR versus LW at 12.49%.

Does ELF or LW pay a bigger dividend?

LW pays a dividend (2.74% yield), while ELF has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is ELF or LW more profitable?

LW runs the higher net margin — ELF at 3.38% versus LW at 4.39%.

How have ELF and LW total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, ELF delivered 28.18% and LW delivered -1.62% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) vs Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW)

A side-by-side comparison of e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ELF

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.

$6.17B

$104.76Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 2:35 PM EDT

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.

$7.58B

$55.14Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 2:35 PM EDT

Total return — ELF vs LW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ELF +310.6% (+15.2%/yr)LW +89.4% (+6.6%/yr)ELF compounded faster over this window

ELF LW

ELF vs LW: by the numbers

•LW is the larger company ($7.58B vs $6.17B market cap).
•LW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (26.35 vs 106.14 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LW converts more revenue to profit (4.39% vs 3.38% net margin).
•ELF grew revenue faster over the past five years (38.12% vs 12.49% CAGR).
•LW pays a dividend (2.74% yield), while ELF has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ELF	LW
P/E ratio	106.14	26.35
Forward P/E	34.21	19.75
P/S ratio	3.60	1.14
P/B ratio	5.43	4.14
EV / EBITDA	24.95	11.70
FCF yield	4.42%	10.88%

Profitability

Metric	ELF	LW
Gross margin	74.44%	20.56%
Operating margin	10.50%	8.94%
Net margin	3.38%	4.39%
ROE	5.10%	15.89%
ROIC	6.12%	6.54%

Dividends

Metric	ELF	LW
Dividend yield	N/A	2.74%
Payout ratio	N/A	71.77%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ELF	LW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	38.12%	12.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	28.19%	10.92%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	74.16%	13.64%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.18%	-1.62%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ELF or LW?: LW has the lower trailing P/E: ELF trades at 106.14 and LW at 26.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ELF or LW?: Over the past five years, ELF grew revenue faster — ELF at a 38.12% CAGR versus LW at 12.49%.
Does ELF or LW pay a bigger dividend?: LW pays a dividend (2.74% yield), while ELF has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is ELF or LW more profitable?: LW runs the higher net margin — ELF at 3.38% versus LW at 4.39%.
How have ELF and LW total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, ELF delivered 28.18% and LW delivered -1.62% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ELF analysis Full LW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

e.l.f. Beauty P/E ratio Lamb Weston P/E ratio Lamb Weston dividend yield e.l.f. Beauty ROE Lamb Weston ROE e.l.f. Beauty operating margin Lamb Weston operating margin e.l.f. Beauty revenue growth Lamb Weston revenue growth e.l.f. Beauty free cash flow Lamb Weston free cash flow

e.l.f. Beauty & Lamb Weston appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 28, 2026.