Which has grown faster, EL or STZ?

Over the past five years, STZ grew revenue faster — EL at a 0.17% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.

Does EL or STZ pay a bigger dividend?

EL yields 1.65% and STZ yields 2.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is EL or STZ more profitable?

STZ runs the higher net margin — EL at -1.67% versus STZ at 18.46%.

Which has been the better investment, EL or STZ?

Over the past 10-year, STZ delivered the higher annualized total return — EL at 0.47% versus STZ at 0.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

STZ leads on 13 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

$30.67B

$84.81Consumer Defensive

STZ

Constellation Brands, Inc.

$24.22B

$141.18Consumer Defensive

Total return — EL vs STZ

growth of $100 · last 30y

EL +795.6%STZ +3483.2%STZ compounded faster

EL STZ

EL vs STZ: by the numbers

•EL is the larger company ($30.67B vs $24.22B market cap).
•STZ is profitable (18.46% net margin) while EL runs a net loss (-1.67%).
•STZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.19% vs 0.17% CAGR).
•STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.90% vs 1.65%).

Which is better, EL or STZ?

Metric tally: EL 2 · STZ 13

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthSTZ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)

QualitySTZ(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EL	STZ
P/E ratio	—	14.72
Forward P/E	26.63	11.36●
P/S ratio	2.09●	2.68
P/B ratio	7.76	3.03●
EV / EBITDA	27.69	11.29●
FCF yield	4.15%	7.32%●

Profitability

Metric	EL	STZ
Gross margin	73.40%●	51.67%
Operating margin	7.56%	31.33%●
Net margin	-1.67%	18.46%●
ROE	-6.21%	20.87%●
ROIC	6.44%	10.48%●

Dividends

Metric	EL	STZ
Dividend yield	1.65%	2.90%●
Payout ratio	—	42.52%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EL	STZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.17%	1.19%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-25.98%	-1.59%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-12.95%	-1.57%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-20.94%	-6.95%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, EL or STZ?: It depends on your goal. growth: STZ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: STZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 13 to 2.
Which has grown faster, EL or STZ?: Over the past five years, STZ grew revenue faster — EL at a 0.17% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
Does EL or STZ pay a bigger dividend?: EL yields 1.65% and STZ yields 2.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is EL or STZ more profitable?: STZ runs the higher net margin — EL at -1.67% versus STZ at 18.46%.
Which has been the better investment, EL or STZ?: Over the past 10-year, STZ delivered the higher annualized total return — EL at 0.47% versus STZ at 0.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EL analysis Full STZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Estée Lauder Companies P/E ratio Constellation Brands P/E ratio Estée Lauder Companies dividend yield Constellation Brands dividend yield Estée Lauder Companies ROE Constellation Brands ROE Estée Lauder Companies operating margin Constellation Brands operating margin Estée Lauder Companies revenue growth Constellation Brands revenue growth Estée Lauder Companies free cash flow Constellation Brands free cash flow

Estée Lauder Companies & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.