Which has the lower trailing P/E, EG or NA?

NA has the lower trailing P/E: EG trades at 7.92 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EG or NA?

Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — EG at a 10.61% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.

Does EG or NA pay a bigger dividend?

EG pays a dividend (2.05% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is EG or NA more profitable?

NA runs the higher net margin — EG at 11.86% versus NA at 505.49%.

Everest Group, Ltd. (EG) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)

A side-by-side comparison of Everest Group, Ltd. and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: EG is classified in Financial Services; NA is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Everest Group, Ltd.

$15.78B

$398.70Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Nano Labs Ltd

$119M

$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — EG vs NA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y

EG +46.5%NA -98.4%EG compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

EG NA

EG vs NA: by the numbers

•EG is the larger company ($15.78B vs $119M market cap).
•NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 7.92 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 11.86% net margin).
•NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 10.61% CAGR).
•EG pays a dividend (2.05% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EG	NA
P/E ratio	7.92	2.30
Forward P/E	7.43	N/A
P/S ratio	0.91	11.40
P/B ratio	1.03	0.41
PEG ratio	0.47	N/A
EV / EBITDA	N/A	6.44

Profitability

Metric	EG	NA
Gross margin	28.48%	-147.33%
Operating margin	14.23%	-396.84%
Net margin	11.86%	505.49%
ROE	13.30%	17.96%
ROIC	8.05%	-10.96%

Dividends

Metric	EG	NA
Dividend yield	2.05%	N/A
Payout ratio	21.13%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EG	NA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.61%	64.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.21%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	12.86%	N/A

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EG or NA?: NA has the lower trailing P/E: EG trades at 7.92 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EG or NA?: Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — EG at a 10.61% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.
Does EG or NA pay a bigger dividend?: EG pays a dividend (2.05% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is EG or NA more profitable?: NA runs the higher net margin — EG at 11.86% versus NA at 505.49%.

Go deeper

Full EG analysis Full NA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Everest P/E ratio Nano Labs P/E ratio Everest dividend yield Nano Labs dividend yield Everest ROE Nano Labs ROE Everest operating margin Nano Labs operating margin Everest revenue growth Nano Labs revenue growth Everest free cash flow Nano Labs free cash flow

Everest & Nano Labs appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.