Which has the lower trailing P/E, EEFT or PAYO?

EEFT has the lower trailing P/E: EEFT trades at 10.12 and PAYO at 52.07. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EEFT or PAYO?

Over the past five years, PAYO grew revenue faster — EEFT at a 9.82% CAGR versus PAYO at 22.21%.

Is EEFT or PAYO more profitable?

EEFT runs the higher net margin — EEFT at 6.59% versus PAYO at 4.65%.

How have EEFT and PAYO total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, EEFT delivered -13.46% and PAYO delivered -3.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) vs Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO)

A side-by-side comparison of Euronet Worldwide, Inc. and Payoneer Global Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EEFT

Euronet Worldwide, Inc.

$2.45B

$64.44TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:50 AM EDT

PAYO

Payoneer Global Inc.

$2.42B

$7.16TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:50 AM EDT

Total return — EEFT vs PAYO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

EEFT -27.9% (-5.3%/yr)PAYO -26.1% (-4.9%/yr)PAYO compounded faster over this window

EEFT PAYO

EEFT vs PAYO: by the numbers

•EEFT is the larger company ($2.45B vs $2.42B market cap).
•EEFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.12 vs 52.07 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•EEFT converts more revenue to profit (6.59% vs 4.65% net margin).
•PAYO grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.21% vs 9.82% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EEFT	PAYO
P/E ratio	10.12	52.07
Forward P/E	6.02	48.16
P/S ratio	0.56	2.24
P/B ratio	1.99	3.70
EV / EBITDA	3.13	11.36
FCF yield	3.87%	5.45%

Profitability

Metric	EEFT	PAYO
Gross margin	33.76%	78.00%
Operating margin	11.55%	10.56%
Net margin	6.59%	4.65%
ROE	23.45%	7.69%
ROIC	7.57%	7.59%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EEFT	PAYO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.82%	22.21%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	21.39%	308.60%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-13.46%	-3.29%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EEFT or PAYO?: EEFT has the lower trailing P/E: EEFT trades at 10.12 and PAYO at 52.07. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EEFT or PAYO?: Over the past five years, PAYO grew revenue faster — EEFT at a 9.82% CAGR versus PAYO at 22.21%.
Is EEFT or PAYO more profitable?: EEFT runs the higher net margin — EEFT at 6.59% versus PAYO at 4.65%.
How have EEFT and PAYO total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, EEFT delivered -13.46% and PAYO delivered -3.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EEFT analysis Full PAYO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Euronet Worldwide P/E ratio Payoneer Global P/E ratio Euronet Worldwide ROE Payoneer Global ROE Euronet Worldwide operating margin Payoneer Global operating margin Euronet Worldwide revenue growth Payoneer Global revenue growth Euronet Worldwide free cash flow Payoneer Global free cash flow

Euronet Worldwide & Payoneer Global appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.