Which has the lower trailing P/E, EEFT or NCNO?

EEFT has the lower trailing P/E: EEFT trades at 9.97 and NCNO at 63.73. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EEFT or NCNO?

Over the past five years, NCNO grew revenue faster — EEFT at a 9.82% CAGR versus NCNO at 21.02%.

Is EEFT or NCNO more profitable?

EEFT runs the higher net margin — EEFT at 6.59% versus NCNO at 5.40%.

How have EEFT and NCNO total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, EEFT delivered -13.46% and NCNO delivered -22.82% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) vs nCino, Inc. (NCNO)

A side-by-side comparison of Euronet Worldwide, Inc. and nCino, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EEFT

Euronet Worldwide, Inc.

$2.42B

$63.54TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

NCNO

nCino, Inc.

$2.09B

$19.12TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — EEFT vs NCNO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

EEFT -31.6% (-6.1%/yr)NCNO -78.9% (-22.9%/yr)EEFT compounded faster over this window

EEFT NCNO

EEFT vs NCNO: by the numbers

•EEFT is the larger company ($2.42B vs $2.09B market cap).
•EEFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.97 vs 63.73 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•EEFT converts more revenue to profit (6.59% vs 5.40% net margin).
•NCNO grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.02% vs 9.82% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EEFT	NCNO
P/E ratio	9.97	63.73
Forward P/E	5.93	N/A
P/S ratio	0.55	3.37
P/B ratio	1.97	2.25
EV / EBITDA	3.11	26.13
FCF yield	3.92%	6.31%

Profitability

Metric	EEFT	NCNO
Gross margin	33.76%	61.51%
Operating margin	11.55%	8.07%
Net margin	6.59%	5.40%
ROE	23.45%	3.61%
ROIC	7.57%	3.87%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EEFT	NCNO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.82%	21.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	21.39%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-13.46%	-22.82%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EEFT or NCNO?: EEFT has the lower trailing P/E: EEFT trades at 9.97 and NCNO at 63.73. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EEFT or NCNO?: Over the past five years, NCNO grew revenue faster — EEFT at a 9.82% CAGR versus NCNO at 21.02%.
Is EEFT or NCNO more profitable?: EEFT runs the higher net margin — EEFT at 6.59% versus NCNO at 5.40%.
How have EEFT and NCNO total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, EEFT delivered -13.46% and NCNO delivered -22.82% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EEFT analysis Full NCNO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Euronet Worldwide P/E ratio nCino P/E ratio Euronet Worldwide ROE nCino ROE Euronet Worldwide operating margin nCino operating margin Euronet Worldwide revenue growth nCino revenue growth Euronet Worldwide free cash flow nCino free cash flow

Euronet Worldwide & nCino appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.