Which has the lower trailing P/E, EEFT or INOD?

EEFT has the lower trailing P/E: EEFT trades at 10.08 and INOD at 51.23. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EEFT or INOD?

Over the past five years, INOD grew revenue faster — EEFT at a 9.82% CAGR versus INOD at 38.23%.

Is EEFT or INOD more profitable?

INOD runs the higher net margin — EEFT at 6.59% versus INOD at 14.66%.

How have EEFT and INOD total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, EEFT delivered -2.60% and INOD delivered 39.33% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) vs Innodata Inc. (INOD)

A side-by-side comparison of Euronet Worldwide, Inc. and Innodata Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EEFT

Euronet Worldwide, Inc.

$2.44B

$64.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:10 PM EDT

INOD

Innodata Inc.

$2.21B

$67.62TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:10 PM EDT

Total return — EEFT vs INOD

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

EEFT -23.2% (-2.6%/yr)INOD +2600.4% (+39.0%/yr)INOD compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

EEFT INOD

EEFT vs INOD: by the numbers

•EEFT is the larger company ($2.44B vs $2.21B market cap).
•EEFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.08 vs 51.23 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•INOD converts more revenue to profit (14.66% vs 6.59% net margin).
•INOD grew revenue faster over the past five years (38.23% vs 9.82% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EEFT	INOD
P/E ratio	10.08	51.23
Forward P/E	5.99	54.83
PEG ratio	N/A	0.48
P/S ratio	0.56	6.96
P/B ratio	1.99	13.84
EV / EBITDA	3.13	31.38
FCF yield	3.88%	9.90%

Profitability

Metric	EEFT	INOD
Gross margin	33.76%	42.63%
Operating margin	11.55%	16.97%
Net margin	6.59%	14.66%
ROE	23.45%	29.14%
ROIC	7.57%	24.70%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EEFT	INOD
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.82%	38.23%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	109.40%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	21.39%	104.30%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-13.46%	45.82%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EEFT or INOD?: EEFT has the lower trailing P/E: EEFT trades at 10.08 and INOD at 51.23. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EEFT or INOD?: Over the past five years, INOD grew revenue faster — EEFT at a 9.82% CAGR versus INOD at 38.23%.
Is EEFT or INOD more profitable?: INOD runs the higher net margin — EEFT at 6.59% versus INOD at 14.66%.
How have EEFT and INOD total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, EEFT delivered -2.60% and INOD delivered 39.33% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EEFT analysis Full INOD analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Euronet Worldwide P/E ratio Innodata P/E ratio Euronet Worldwide ROE Innodata ROE Euronet Worldwide operating margin Innodata operating margin Euronet Worldwide revenue growth Innodata revenue growth Euronet Worldwide free cash flow Innodata free cash flow

Euronet Worldwide & Innodata appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.